The Mandate
An agricultural operator with 12,400 acres in row-crop and livestock production engaged Feasibility Study Consultant to prepare a third-party feasibility study supporting a USDA REAP financing request for a project located in Story County, Iowa. Total project capitalization fell within the $1M-$3M band. The capital provider, a regional credit union with USDA REAP guarantee, required documentation consistent with current program review standards. The analytical question put to the team: Did the projected energy production, utility avoided-cost rates, and federal tax credits support a REAP-eligible solar installation.
Engagement Scope
- Primary market area defined as a n/a radius
- Comparable supply set of 6 properties
- Demand model framework: energy production and utility avoided-cost build
- Financial projection horizon: 15 years
- Site inspection completed; operator interviews where applicable
- Primary data collection through field reconnaissance and third-party market data
Methodology Applied
Primary Market Area
The PMA was defined as a n/a radius from the subject site, calibrated to the demand catchment behavior typical of renewable energy assets in Iowa. The boundary captured the population, employment, and competitive supply base relevant to the subject's operating thesis.
Supply and Demand Reconciliation
The comparable supply set comprised 6 properties operating within the PMA or in directly substitutable submarkets. Demand was modeled using a energy production and utility avoided-cost build approach over a 15 years horizon. The reconciliation tested whether incremental supply, including the subject, could be absorbed within the projection window without compromising stabilized occupancy assumptions.
Capture Rate Calibration
The subject's capture rate was calibrated against the absorption capacity of the PMA. The analysis concluded that PMA absorption capacity exceeded subject build-out by a factor of 1.4 across the projection window, with a stabilized capture rate of n/a.
Exhibit 1: Comparable Supply Set, Iowa PMA
[Table or chart rendered in delivered report.]
Exhibit 2: Demand Projection Summary, 15 years Horizon
[Table or chart rendered in delivered report.]
Exhibit 3: Subject Capture Rate vs. PMA Absorption Capacity
[Table or chart rendered in delivered report.]
Analytical Conclusions
- Modeled annual energy production of 1.68 GWh aligned with NREL solar-resource data for the site.
- Avoided-cost utility rates supported a projected 7.4-year simple payback before tax credits.
- Federal investment tax credit and accelerated depreciation reduced effective payback to 4.1 years.
- REAP eligibility confirmed; rural designation and renewable-technology criteria satisfied.
Deliverable
The delivered report ran 84 pages with 18 exhibits distributed across nine analytical sections, plus appendices documenting comparable supply data, demographic inputs, and financial projection assumptions. The document was prepared to the documentation standards of the regional credit union with USDA REAP guarantee. The corresponding USDA REAP review framework guided exhibit selection and supporting documentation.