Model study: an illustrative feasibility analysis built on public data for Faulkner County, Arkansas; not a client engagement.
Project summary
| Item | Modelled value |
|---|---|
| Asset | Freestanding primary care clinic seeking certification as an independent Rural Health Clinic (RHC), with lab, basic x-ray and behavioral health |
| Size | 12,000 sq ft on about 3 acres; stabilized roster of 1.5 physician, 3.5 nurse practitioner or physician assistant (APP) and 1.0 behavioral health FTE |
| Location | Greenbrier, Faulkner County, Arkansas (2025 population estimate 6,645) [1] |
| Program | USDA Community Facilities (CF) direct loan, 7 CFR part 1942 subpart A [2]; CF grant tested under 7 CFR 3570.63 [3] |
| Total project cost | $8,738,938, including a $1,200,000 working capital and ramp-up reserve |
| Loan structure | $5,250,000 CF direct loan (60.1%), 5.50% assumed market rate, 40 years, 24 months interest-only; $3,488,938 borrower equity (39.9%) |
| Stabilized DSCR | 1.27 in Year 4 (1.10 in Year 3, 1.46 in Year 10) |
| IRR | Unlevered 0.41%; levered -9.94% (mission capital, not an investment) |
| Determination | Financeable as the obligation of an established nonprofit operator with outside cash flow; not as a stand-alone single-clinic borrower |
The credit question
A CF loan for a clinic has no tenant and no lease for a lender to rely on. The debt is paid from the gap between what payers reimburse per visit and what it costs to staff the rooms, and in primary care that gap is narrow. The modelled clinic earns a 12.1% EBIDA margin at stabilization, so small misses in volume or rate consume most of the cash available for debt service. A lender has to be convinced of five things, in rough order of damage:
- RHC certification at this address. Medicare pays an RHC an all-inclusive rate (AIR) built from its allowable cost per visit, up to a per-visit limit, instead of fee-schedule amounts [4][5]. Without RHC status, the modelled 1.27 DSCR becomes negative cash flow. The model treats certification as unresolved until the clinic is open, surveyed and enrolled, so the lender carries this risk through construction.
- Providers hired and productive. Stabilized volume of 20,575 visits needs 6.0 provider FTE on full schedules. A two-year APP vacancy pushes DSCR below 0.6.
- A stable payer mix. Federal law now requires states to make Medicaid eligibility for expansion adults depend on 80 hours a month of work or other qualifying activity, starting no later than the first quarter that begins after December 31, 2026 [6]. Arkansas covers those adults through ARHOME. A four-point shift of visits to self-pay takes Year 4 DSCR below 1.0.
- CF terms as modelled. Rate tier, 40-year amortization, principal deferral and the absence of grant funds all turn on population and income tests [2][3].
- Capacity to carry the ramp. Years 1 and 2 lose $723,074 after debt service, which must be funded up front.
Location and county economy
Why Greenbrier
CF loans for essential community facilities are not made to a city or town of more than 20,000 inhabitants in the most recent decennial census [2]. Several Faulkner County towns are well under that limit on Census estimates: Greenbrier (6,645 in 2025), Vilonia (4,894), Mayflower (2,372), Wooster (1,150), Guy (798), Holland (602), Enola (334), Twin Groves (320), Mount Vernon (148) and part of Damascus. Conway, at 72,328, is not [1]. Greenbrier is the modelled location for four reasons.
- Size and growth. It is the largest eligible town and the fastest growing, up 16.05% from an April 2020 estimates base of 5,726, about 2.88% a year [1].
- Rural status. The 2020 Census placed 66,619 county residents in urban territory [7], exactly the population of the Conway urban area [8]; the other 56,879 (46.1%) are rural [7]. There is no Greenbrier urban area in the 2020 list [8], and the Conway urban area exceeds Conway city's 64,150 estimates base [1] by only about 2,500 people, so it almost certainly stops short of Greenbrier. The parcel still needs a block-level check.
- An underserved catchment. The ZIP areas north of town (Damascus 72039, Enola 72047, Guy 72061, Mount Vernon 72111) had no health care establishments listed in 2023 ZIP Code Business Patterns [9].
- Access. Greenbrier sits on the US-65 corridor that northern residents already drive.
The trade-off is priority scoring. A project in a rural community of 5,500 or fewer earns 20 points, and of 2,500 or fewer 25 points, under 7 CFR 1942.17(c)(2)(iii)(A) [2]. Greenbrier's April 2020 estimates base of 5,726 [1] suggests it is above 5,500 and earns none, while Vilonia would earn 20; the decennial count governs. Points rank eligible applications when the State Director selects which to process [2]; they do not decide eligibility. The demand case favours Greenbrier.
County indicators
| Indicator | Faulkner County | Arkansas |
|---|---|---|
| Population, July 1, 2025 [10] | 133,979 | n/a |
| Growth from April 2020 base (123,500) [10] | +8.49% | n/a |
| Population 65+, 2025, and growth since 2020 [10] | 20,667 (15.43%), +21.62% | n/a |
| Median age, 2025 [10] | 34.9 | n/a |
| Median household income, ACS 2024 1-year [11] | $71,446 (±$7,804) | $62,106 (±$831) |
| Per capita income, ACS 2024 1-year [11] | $35,098 | $34,812 |
| Below poverty, ACS 2024 1-year [11] | 14.1% (±4.1%) | 15.5% |
| Households, ACS 2024 1-year [11] | 50,276 | 1,246,754 |
| Bachelor's degree or higher, age 25+, ACS 2024 1-year [11] | 38.1% | 27.1% |
| Under 18, ACS 2024 1-year [11] | 22.6% | 22.6% |
Two facts carry credit weight. The older population is growing fastest, up 21.62% since the April 2020 base [10], which supports volume and the cost-based Medicare share. County income is 115% of the state figure [11], which, because CF rate tiers and grant percentages are income-tested [2][3], is the main reason this model assumes the market rate and no grant. The model also assumes steady competition for medical assistants and front-desk staff, reflected in a 3% wage escalator.
Employment base
| Sector, Faulkner County, 2023 [12] | Employees | Establishments |
|---|---|---|
| All private industries | 37,718 | 2,990 |
| Health care and social assistance | 6,767 | 414 |
| Retail trade | 6,545 | 418 |
| Accommodation and food services | 5,181 | 268 |
| Construction | 3,696 | 384 |
| Manufacturing | 3,270 | 93 |
| Hospitals | 1,592 | 3 |
| Offices of physicians (NAICS 621111) | 852 | 78 |
Health care is the largest private sector, with 17.9% of jobs [12]. Three hospital establishments employ 1,592 people, while offices of physicians employ only 852 at 78 establishments county-wide [12]. The labour pool is real, but much of it sits with a few hospital employers that also compete for the same clinicians.
Market analysis
Service area and population
The primary service area (PSA) is five ZIP Code Tabulation Areas (ZCTAs) along and beside US-65 north of Conway. North Conway and Van Buren County are secondary.
| ZCTA | Population | Under 18 | 65+ | Median household income |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 72058 Greenbrier | 18,880 | 30.0% | 15.3% | $76,463 |
| 72039 Damascus | 1,983 | 23.6% | 20.8% | $63,667 |
| 72047 Enola | 894 | 19.9% | 35.0% | $61,944 |
| 72061 Guy | 207 | 2.9% | 38.2% | $81,141 |
| 72111 Mount Vernon | 1,283 | 26.7% | 19.0% | $52,059 |
| PSA total / weighted | 23,247 | 28.7% | 16.9% | n/a |
| Greenbrier city | 6,018 | 27.0% | 12.8% | $57,214 |
Source: ACS 2024 5-year table-based summary file, tables B01003, B09001, B09020 and B19013 [13]. Margins are wide in the small ZCTAs; the Guy population estimate of 207 carries a margin of 155, too wide to use alone [13].
The PSA holds about 23,247 people, 3,935 of them 65 or older [13]. Its distinctive feature is youth: 28.7% are under 18, against 22.6% in the county and the state in the 2024 1-year survey [11]. The model expects that pediatric volume to be paid largely by Medicaid (ARKids) and family commercial plans. The northern ZCTAs are older (35.0% of Enola's residents and 38.2% of Guy's are 65 or older), and Mount Vernon has the lowest median household income in the PSA, $52,059 [13]. These are the residents farthest from Conway's clinics.
Insurance coverage
| SAHIE 2024 [14] | Faulkner County | Arkansas |
|---|---|---|
| Uninsured, under 65 | 9.2% (±1.0), 9,979 people | 11.3% |
| Uninsured, adults 18 to 64 | 10.4% (±1.2) | 13.0% |
| Uninsured, children under 19 | 6.2% (±1.5) | 7.4% |
| Uninsured, under 65 at or below 138% of poverty | 17.3% (±2.5) | 17.2% |
About one in eleven county residents under 65 is uninsured, rising to 17.3% at or below 138% of poverty, the income band of the Medicaid expansion [14]. That group is the most exposed to the new federal community engagement rule. Public Law 119-21 requires states to make Medicaid eligibility for expansion adults, and for equivalent coverage under a waiver, depend on at least 80 hours a month of work, community service or a work program (or a combination), half-time enrollment in education, or monthly earnings of at least the federal minimum wage times 80 hours. The requirement starts no later than the first day of the first quarter that begins after December 31, 2026 [6]. Arkansas covers its expansion adults through ARHOME. The direction for payer mix is clear: some ARHOME volume will become self-pay, and the model tests that.
Shortage-area status
An RHC must be located in a rural area that is designated as a shortage area [15]. Under the same regulation, a rural area is one not delineated as an urbanized area by the Census Bureau, and a shortage area is one the Department of Health and Human Services designates as short of personal health services or of primary medical care manpower [15].
The designation that covers the site, its type and its date must be confirmed in writing with HRSA or the Arkansas Primary Care Office before commitment. This model treats that confirmation as a condition, not a fact. If no qualifying designation covers the site, the borrower must pursue a new designation application, which the lower-income northern ZCTAs may support, or accept fee-schedule economics that do not service the debt. How CMS applies the 2020 Census urban areas to the regulation's term "urbanized area" is a related diligence item.
Existing supply
| ZIP Code Business Patterns 2023 [9] | All establishments | Health care and social assistance | Offices of physicians (NAICS 621111) |
|---|---|---|---|
| 72058 Greenbrier | 419 | 43 | 4 |
| 72039, 72047, 72061, 72111 (northern PSA) | 90 | none listed | none listed |
| 72032 and 72034 Conway | 2,237 | 347 | 68 |
The health care category also counts dentists, therapists, home health and social assistance. The PSA has four physician offices, all in Greenbrier, against 68 in Conway's two ZIP codes [9]: a commuter catchment whose residents get care where they work. The model includes no planned clinics, so new competition is treated as a risk, not a base-case input. A hospital-affiliated clinic in Greenbrier would be the most damaging entrant, competing for the same commercial patients and clinicians.
Demand and capture
| Step | Value | Basis |
|---|---|---|
| PSA population, ACS 2024 5-year | 23,247 | [13] |
| Annual growth | 1.563% | County growth, April 2020 base to July 2025 [10] |
| PSA population, Year 1 / Year 4 | 25,515 / 26,730 | 6 and 9 years from the ACS midpoint (model) |
| Primary care visits per person | 1.614 | Assumption |
| PSA primary care visits, Year 1 / Year 4 | 41,181 / 43,142 | Population × rate (model) |
| Clinic visits, Year 1 / Year 4 | 9,818 / 20,575 | Revenue build (model) |
| Share from PSA (assumption) | 70% | Rest from secondary market |
| Implied PSA capture, Year 1 / Year 4 | 16.7% / 33.4% | Clinic PSA visits ÷ PSA demand (model) |
The visit rate is a single all-ages assumption. A young PSA may use fewer physician visits per person, while visits delivered by nurse practitioners and physician assistants add volume that physician-only rates miss. The model treats the two effects as roughly offsetting.
A 33.4% stabilized capture is the model's most aggressive assumption: one in three primary care visits by PSA residents would move to the new clinic. It is plausible rather than certain, given four physician offices for about 23,000 people [9][13] and growth of 1.6% a year in the county and about 2.9% in Greenbrier [10][1]. Capture is the second-largest risk after certification: the sensitivity grid shows a 5% volume shortfall takes Year 4 DSCR below 1.0.
Forecast
Productivity ramps to 70%, 88%, 97% and 100% of standard over Years 1 to 4, while provider FTE rise from 4.0 to 6.0. After Year 4, visits grow 1% a year with no added FTE, below county population growth. Medicare's share stays at 26% for ten years, although the faster-growing 65+ population would likely raise it; that is conservative because Medicare is the best-paying class in the stabilized years.
Site and technical
Site. About 3 acres near US-65 with public water and sewer, about 60 parking spaces, an ambulance bay and room to add 3,000 sq ft. RD adds a constraint a bank would not: under 7 CFR 1942.17(f)(5), the CF rate rises two percentage points if the project involves the use of, or construction on, prime or unique farmland [2]. Open land at the edge of town may carry that classification, so an in-town commercial parcel avoids both the penalty, worth about 0.20 of Year 4 DSCR in the model, and a rezoning.
Zoning and approvals. Greenbrier has an O-1 Office and Quiet Business district and C-1, C-2 and C-3 commercial districts [16]; the ordinance's use tables must confirm where a clinic is permitted. Variances, special uses and rezonings go to the Planning Commission, which meets the third Monday of each month. The application must show existing land uses within 200 feet and carries a $75 filing fee [16]. For commercial buildings, Arkansas adopts the International Energy Conservation Code [16]. A CF health care loan also needs a statement from the responsible State agency that the facility is not inconsistent with the State Medical Facilities Plan, and a statement that it meets the standards in 7 CFR 1942.18(d)(4) [2]. CF loans must also comply with the environmental review rules in 7 CFR part 1970 [2]. The on-site lab must operate under 42 CFR part 493, because an RHC provides basic tests on site, including urine chemistry, blood glucose and pregnancy tests [15].
Construction. A single-storey building on a slab, design-bid-build: about 24 exam rooms, two procedure rooms, lab, x-ray, three behavioral health offices, care coordination, staff space and a community room. Hard cost is assumed at $385 per sq ft, or $411.95 with a 7% contingency. An architect's estimate is a condition.
| Phase (assumed) | Window | Credit relevance |
|---|---|---|
| Site control, design, feasibility study | Nov 2026 to Mar 2027 | Fixes cost and site eligibility |
| CF application, environmental review | Mar to Aug 2027 | Letter of conditions sets rate, term, security |
| Bidding, interim loan closing | Sep 2027 | Interim lender carries completion risk |
| Construction, 12 months | Oct 2027 to Sep 2028 | Contingency, bonds |
| Recruitment and credentialing | Jan to Sep 2028 | Signed provider agreements |
| Opening, Medicare enrollment, RHC survey | Oct 2028 to early 2029 | Certification resolved only once open (model assumption) |
| Operating Year 1 | Oct 2028 to Sep 2029 | Interest-only debt service |
The borrower may ask in writing before closing for the lower of the approval-date or closing-date rate [2]; on a 12-month build that request costs nothing.
Development budget and sources and uses
Development budget
| Line item | Amount | Share |
|---|---|---|
| Land, about 3 acres in town | $270,000 | 3.1% |
| Site work, paving, utilities | $450,000 | 5.1% |
| Building, 12,000 sq ft at $385 | $4,620,000 | 52.9% |
| Hard-cost contingency, 7% | $323,400 | 3.7% |
| Architecture and engineering, 8% of hard cost | $369,600 | 4.2% |
| Medical equipment, lab, x-ray, IT, furniture | $850,000 | 9.7% |
| Legal, title, closing | $90,000 | 1.0% |
| Feasibility study, appraisal, environmental review | $60,000 | 0.7% |
| Recruitment, credentialing, pre-opening | $250,000 | 2.9% |
| Interim construction interest | $216,563 | 2.5% |
| Interim loan fee | $39,375 | 0.5% |
| Working capital and ramp-up reserve | $1,200,000 | 13.7% |
| Total project cost | $8,738,938 | 100.0% |
All figures in this budget are model inputs and results. All-in cost is $728 per sq ft; real estate alone (land, site, building, contingency, design) is $6,033,000. The ramp reserve is sized from the model: $723,074 of Year 1 and 2 losses after debt service plus 90 days of Year 1 operating expense ($473,105), rounded to $1,200,000. Interim interest assumes a 55% average draw on $5,250,000 at 7.5% for 12 months.
Sources and uses
| Sources | Amount | Share |
|---|---|---|
| USDA CF direct loan | $5,250,000 | 60.1% |
| Borrower equity (reserves and capital campaign) | $3,488,938 | 39.9% |
| Total sources | $8,738,938 | 100.0% |
| Uses: real estate | $6,033,000 | 69.0% |
| Uses: equipment | $850,000 | 9.7% |
| Uses: soft costs and interim financing | $655,938 | 7.5% |
| Uses: working capital and ramp reserve | $1,200,000 | 13.7% |
| Total uses | $8,738,938 | 100.0% |
The model sizes the loan by cash flow. The binding program rules are credit elsewhere (the applicant certifies in writing that it cannot finance the project from its own resources or through commercial credit at reasonable rates and terms) and security (the as-developed market value, set by a qualified appraiser, must equal or exceed the loan plus any other debt against the security) [2]. At 87.0% of real estate cost, the loan meets the security test if the clinic appraises near cost. The 39.9% equity is what debt capacity leaves; for a mid-sized nonprofit it means a capital campaign or unrestricted reserves.
The regulation also lets loan funds pay initial operating expenses for a period ordinarily not exceeding one year when the borrower cannot pay them, and interest until the facility is self-supporting, for up to three years unless the National Office approves longer [2]. The model funds the ramp reserve with equity instead. That is the conservative case; a lender could finance part of the reserve if the letter of conditions allows it.
No CF grant. CF grant percentages require the service area's median household income to be below the higher of the poverty line or 60%, 70%, 80% or 90% of the State nonmetropolitan median, with larger shares for smaller communities, and grant funds cannot pay any cost of a project whose service-area income is above that threshold [3]. The regulation's tiers are 75% of eligible cost for communities of 5,000 or less, 55% for 12,000 or less, 35% for 20,000 or less and 15% for 50,000 or less, although the program defines a rural area as one of 20,000 inhabitants or less [3]. The model treats the RD National Office's Arkansas nonmetropolitan median as unknown and bounds the test instead. Greenbrier's $57,214 [13] fails even the 90% tier unless that median exceeds $63,571, which is above the $60,773 median of all Arkansas households in the same ACS 5-year series [13]. The Greenbrier ZCTA ($76,463 [13]) fails by more. A grant is upside only if the State Office documents a lower-income service area.
Revenue build and operating expenses
Assumptions
| Assumption | Value | Rationale |
|---|---|---|
| CF market rate | 5.50% | Assumption; the 10-year Treasury yield was 4.88% on November 9, 2026 [17] |
| Intermediate / poverty rates | 5.00% / 4.50% | Assumption; the intermediate rate is the poverty rate plus half the gap to market [2] |
| Interim loan | 7.5%, 0.75% fee, 55% average draw | Assumption: bank construction pricing |
| Hard cost | $385 per sq ft, 7% contingency | Assumption, to be replaced by an architect's estimate |
| Productivity at full ramp | 4,600 / 3,450 / 1,600 visits per MD / APP / BH FTE | Assumption: about 20, 15 and 7 visits a day over 230 days |
| Visit growth after Year 4 | 1.0% a year | Assumption, below county population growth [10] |
| Share of visits from PSA | 70% | Assumption: secondary market supplies the rest |
| Payer mix | Medicare 26%, Medicaid 16%, ARHOME 10%, commercial 40%, self-pay 8% | Assumption adjusted for PSA age and county coverage [13][14] |
| Medicaid encounter rate | $165, +2.3% a year | Assumption: new-clinic rate method to be confirmed |
| Commercial / ARHOME | $165 / $145, +2.5% / +2.0% a year | Assumption: negotiated primary care rates |
| Self-pay | $35 a visit | Assumption: sliding fee |
| No-RHC fallback | Medicare $112, Medicaid $85 a visit | Assumption: fee-schedule averages |
| AIR limit growth after 2028 | 2.3% a year | Assumption for the MEI increase the rule applies [4] |
| Collection loss / ancillary revenue | 3% / 8% | Assumption: unpaid cost sharing; lab, imaging and care management outside the AIR |
| Provider pay | $300,000 MD, $130,000 APP, $85,000 LCSW, +22% benefits | Assumption: rural recruitment market |
| Support staff | 2.2 per provider at $42,000; 2 managers at $72,000 | Assumption: lean primary care staffing |
| Escalation | 3.0% wages and costs | Assumption |
| Medicare allowable cost | 95% of opex plus depreciation and interest | Assumption: small non-allowable items |
| Replacement reserve / exit cap | $3 per sq ft / 8.50% | Assumption: building systems; special-purpose real estate |
How the clinic gets paid
Medicare pays an independent RHC an all-inclusive rate for each visit, subject to a per-visit payment limit [4]. The Medicare Administrative Contractor sets the rate at the start of each cost reporting period by dividing estimated allowable costs by estimated visits, and reviews and adjusts it during the period [5]. Allowable costs follow Medicare's provider cost principles for items such as interest and depreciation [18]. The limit is $165 in 2026, $178 in 2027 and $190 in 2028, then rises with the Medicare Economic Index (MEI) [4]. Once the Part B deductible is met, Medicare pays 80% of the rate [4]. Two consequences run through the model.
- The limit binds only in Year 1. At low Year 1 volume, cost per visit is $234.05 and Medicare pays the $190 limit. From Year 2, cost falls below the limit and Medicare pays cost: $165.53 in Year 4 against a $203.41 limit. Medicare covers its share of cost, including depreciation and interest, but adds little margin. The margin comes from commercial and ARHOME patients.
- Productivity screens. Medicare's screening guidelines can test staffing and the cost of practitioner services [18]. The model applies a combined minimum of 4,200 visits per physician FTE and 2,100 per APP FTE (an assumption); a shortfall raises the divisor and lowers the AIR. In Year 1 the combined 9,258 visits are 192 short of the 9,450 expected, which has no effect because the limit already binds. From Year 2, actual visits clear the screen.
The model assumes Arkansas Medicaid pays the clinic a per-visit encounter rate, and that ARHOME and commercial plans pay negotiated rates.
Provider recruitment and productivity
The roster is APP-heavy by design. RHC rules require a nurse practitioner, physician assistant or certified nurse-midwife to be available to furnish patient care at least 50% of the time the clinic operates, and at least one physician assistant or nurse practitioner must be an employee of the clinic [15]. APPs also cost less than half as much as physicians per visit in this model ($46 against $80 of salary and benefits per visit at full productivity). The 1.5 physician FTE supply medical direction, collaboration with newer nurse practitioners, complex patients and the procedure rooms.
Recruitment shapes the ramp more than demand does. A rural clinic opening near a large system recruits against that system's pay scale and call schedules. Federal workforce programs that key on shortage-area status may help if the site is designated, but this model counts none of them. The 70% Year 1 productivity assumption reflects new panels and credentialing delays: credentialing a new site with each commercial plan takes time. A lender should ask for signed letters of intent with named clinicians, start dates and credentialing timelines before construction begins. It should also ask for evidence of locum coverage, because a vacancy costs about 3,450 visits a year while support staff remain on payroll.
Staffing, visits and rates
| Year | MD FTE | APP FTE | BH FTE | Productivity | Visits | Medicare per visit | AIR limit | Cost per visit | Net per visit |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1.0 | 2.5 | 0.5 | 70.0% | 9,818 | $190.00 | $190.00 | $234.05 | $154.33 |
| 2 | 1.5 | 3.0 | 1.0 | 88.0% | 16,588 | $182.42 | $194.37 | $182.42 | $154.94 |
| 3 | 1.5 | 3.5 | 1.0 | 97.0% | 19,958 | $165.95 | $198.84 | $165.95 | $153.37 |
| 4 | 1.5 | 3.5 | 1.0 | 100.0% | 20,575 | $165.53 | $203.41 | $165.53 | $155.91 |
| 5 | 1.5 | 3.5 | 1.0 | 100.0% | 20,781 | $168.11 | $208.09 | $168.11 | $159.27 |
| 6 | 1.5 | 3.5 | 1.0 | 100.0% | 20,989 | $170.75 | $212.88 | $170.75 | $162.72 |
| 7 | 1.5 | 3.5 | 1.0 | 100.0% | 21,198 | $173.47 | $217.77 | $173.47 | $166.24 |
| 8 | 1.5 | 3.5 | 1.0 | 100.0% | 21,410 | $170.57 | $222.78 | $170.57 | $168.42 |
| 9 | 1.5 | 3.5 | 1.0 | 100.0% | 21,625 | $173.47 | $227.91 | $173.47 | $172.13 |
| 10 | 1.5 | 3.5 | 1.0 | 100.0% | 21,841 | $176.44 | $233.15 | $176.44 | $175.93 |
All figures in this table are modelled; the Year 1 limit of $190.00 is the 2028 statutory limit [4], and later limits apply the assumed 2.3% MEI growth. Cost per visit is allowable cost over visits after the productivity screen. The Year 8 dip reflects the end of seven-year equipment depreciation, which Medicare passes straight through. Net per visit is net patient revenue over visits, after the 3% collection loss.
Payer mix, Year 4
| Payer | Share | Visits | Rate | Gross revenue |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Medicare (AIR) | 26.0% | 5,350 | $165.53 | $885,485 |
| Medicaid and ARKids (encounter rate) | 16.0% | 3,292 | $176.65 | $581,528 |
| ARHOME | 10.0% | 2,058 | $153.88 | $316,598 |
| Commercial | 40.0% | 8,230 | $177.69 | $1,462,364 |
| Self-pay, sliding fee | 8.0% | 1,646 | $37.14 | $61,136 |
| Total | 100.0% | 20,575 | $160.73 | $3,307,111 |
After the 3% collection loss, modelled net patient revenue is $3,207,897. The mix is an assumption with sourced context: the PSA has slightly fewer residents 65+ than Arkansas as a whole (16.9% against 17.6%) and far more children (28.7% against 23.1%) in the same ACS 5-year series [13], and the county's under-65 uninsured rate is 9.2% [14]. Commercial patients supply 44.2% of modelled gross revenue. If the incumbent system's employed practices keep them, and the clinic draws mainly Medicaid and uninsured patients, the margin is gone.
Operating expenses, Year 4
| Expense | Amount | Share of revenue | Per visit |
|---|---|---|---|
| Provider compensation and benefits | $1,319,796 | 38.1% | $64.15 |
| Support staff and management | $931,056 | 26.9% | $45.25 |
| Supplies, lab, IT, billing | $449,657 | 13.0% | $21.85 |
| Occupancy and utilities | $85,233 | 2.5% | $4.14 |
| Insurance, including malpractice | $103,809 | 3.0% | $5.05 |
| Other administrative | $115,582 | 3.3% | $5.62 |
| Replacement reserve | $39,338 | 1.1% | $1.91 |
| Total operating expenses | $3,044,471 | 87.9% | $147.97 |
| NOI (EBIDA) | $420,058 | 12.1% | $20.42 |
All figures in this table are modelled. Staff costs are 65.0% of revenue, with 15.2 support FTE at stabilization. Provider pay, support wages and staffing ratios are assumptions and should be replaced with local market data. The CF rule requires the need for malpractice insurance to be considered carefully for each health care facility it finances [2]. Owner costs (occupancy, insurance, reserve) are $228,380, or 6.6% of revenue. Debt service plus occupancy is $20.17 per visit, fixed for 40 years and partly reimbursed through the AIR's depreciation and interest.
Ten-year pro forma
| Year | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Visits | 9,818 | 16,588 | 19,958 | 20,575 | 20,781 | 20,989 | 21,198 | 21,410 | 21,625 | 21,841 |
| Net patient revenue | 1,515,105 | 2,570,167 | 3,060,962 | 3,207,897 | 3,309,831 | 3,415,179 | 3,524,054 | 3,605,951 | 3,722,241 | 3,842,426 |
| Ancillary and care management | 121,208 | 205,613 | 244,877 | 256,632 | 264,787 | 273,214 | 281,924 | 288,476 | 297,779 | 307,394 |
| Total revenue | 1,636,314 | 2,775,781 | 3,305,838 | 3,464,529 | 3,574,618 | 3,688,393 | 3,805,978 | 3,894,427 | 4,020,020 | 4,149,820 |
| Provider compensation | 814,350 | 1,162,355 | 1,281,355 | 1,319,796 | 1,359,390 | 1,400,171 | 1,442,176 | 1,485,442 | 1,530,005 | 1,575,905 |
| Support staff | 626,592 | 819,555 | 903,938 | 931,056 | 958,988 | 987,757 | 1,017,390 | 1,047,912 | 1,079,349 | 1,111,729 |
| Supplies, IT, billing | 196,350 | 341,713 | 423,464 | 449,657 | 467,778 | 486,630 | 506,241 | 526,643 | 547,866 | 569,945 |
| Occupancy and utilities | 78,000 | 80,340 | 82,750 | 85,233 | 87,790 | 90,423 | 93,136 | 95,930 | 98,808 | 101,772 |
| Insurance | 95,000 | 97,850 | 100,786 | 103,809 | 106,923 | 110,131 | 113,435 | 116,838 | 120,343 | 123,953 |
| Other administrative | 72,412 | 100,072 | 111,692 | 115,582 | 119,235 | 123,005 | 126,895 | 130,911 | 135,055 | 139,332 |
| Replacement reserve | 36,000 | 37,080 | 38,192 | 39,338 | 40,518 | 41,734 | 42,986 | 44,275 | 45,604 | 46,972 |
| Total operating expenses | 1,918,704 | 2,638,965 | 2,942,176 | 3,044,471 | 3,140,621 | 3,239,851 | 3,342,259 | 3,447,950 | 3,557,030 | 3,669,609 |
| NOI (EBIDA) | -282,390 | 136,816 | 363,662 | 420,058 | 433,996 | 448,542 | 463,719 | 446,477 | 462,990 | 480,211 |
| Debt service | 288,750 | 288,750 | 329,728 | 329,728 | 329,728 | 329,728 | 329,728 | 329,728 | 329,728 | 329,728 |
| Cash flow after debt service | -571,140 | -151,934 | 33,934 | 90,330 | 104,268 | 118,813 | 133,990 | 116,748 | 133,262 | 150,482 |
| RD reserve deposit | 0 | 0 | 32,973 | 32,973 | 32,973 | 32,973 | 32,973 | 32,973 | 32,973 | 32,973 |
| Cash flow after reserve | -571,140 | -151,934 | 961 | 57,357 | 71,295 | 85,841 | 101,017 | 83,775 | 100,289 | 117,510 |
All figures in the pro forma are modelled, in dollars. Revenue and expenses grow at almost the same pace from Year 4 to Year 10 (19.8% and 20.5%), so EBIDA margin holds between 11.0% and 12.2% from Year 3. The Year 8 NOI dip is the AIR passing through lower depreciation; the replacement reserve, not depreciation, funds equipment replacement. Cumulative cash flow after debt service over ten years is only $158,754, so the clinic pays its own way from Year 3 but builds little cushion beyond the RD reserve.
Debt structure
| Term | Modelled value | Basis |
|---|---|---|
| Loan | $5,250,000 CF direct loan | Sized to about 1.27 DSCR in Year 4 (model) |
| Interim financing | $5,250,000 construction loan, repaid by the CF loan | Assumption |
| Rate | 5.50% fixed, market tier | Tier tests in 7 CFR 1942.17(f) [2]; rate assumed |
| Term | 40 years | Lesser of useful life, State statute or 40 years [2] |
| Deferral | 24 months interest-only | Principal deferral of up to 36 months allowed [2] |
| Debt service | $288,750 Years 1 and 2; $329,728 from Year 3 | Model |
| Reserve | 10% of the annual installment a year ($32,973) | Reserve of at least one average installment, built at one-tenth a year [2] |
| Security | First mortgage, equipment lien, revenue assignment | 7 CFR 1942.17(g) [2] |
| Equity | $3,488,938 (39.9%) | Cash-flow sizing (model) |
Rate tier. The poverty line rate, capped at 5%, needs service-area income below the poverty line or below 80% of the State nonmetropolitan median; health care facilities that provide direct care are exempt from its separate health-standard purpose test. The intermediate rate, the poverty rate plus half the gap to market and capped at 7%, needs income below the poverty line or not more than 100% of that median. The market rate is set using the Bond Buyer index as guidance. Rates are set at least for each quarter and adjusted to the nearest one-eighth of 1%, and incomes are measured with ACS 5-year data [2]. For the intermediate tier, Greenbrier's $57,214 would require a nonmetropolitan median of at least that amount, 94.1% of the $60,773 median of all Arkansas households in the same series [13], which the model treats as unlikely. The model therefore uses the market rate, and 5.50% is an assumption; the 10-year Treasury yield was 4.88% on November 9, 2026 [17]. If the State Office documented an intermediate-tier service area at 5.00%, Year 4 DSCR would rise to 1.34.
Debt sizing alternatives
| CF loan | Total cost | Equity | Equity share | Debt service | DSCR Y3 | DSCR Y4 | DSCR Y10 | Y4 at 95% volume |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| $4,000,000 | $8,558,000 | $4,558,000 | 53.3% | $251,222 | 1.37 | 1.60 | 1.84 | 1.16 |
| $4,500,000 | $8,622,375 | $4,122,375 | 47.8% | $282,624 | 1.25 | 1.45 | 1.66 | 1.06 |
| $5,000,000 | $8,696,750 | $3,696,750 | 42.5% | $314,027 | 1.15 | 1.33 | 1.52 | 0.98 |
| $5,250,000 | $8,738,938 | $3,488,938 | 39.9% | $329,728 | 1.10 | 1.27 | 1.46 | 0.94 |
| $5,600,000 | $8,786,000 | $3,186,000 | 36.3% | $351,710 | 1.05 | 1.21 | 1.38 | 0.90 |
All figures in this table are modelled. Total cost moves with the loan because interim costs and the ramp reserve do. Each $500,000 less debt adds 0.12 to 0.15 of DSCR but needs about $425,000 to $440,000 more equity, and no practical loan size holds 1.20 through a 5% volume miss. That points the lender toward borrower-level support rather than a smaller loan alone.
DSCR and break-even
| Year | Interest | Principal | Debt service | Ending balance | DSCR |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 288,750 | 0 | 288,750 | 5,250,000 | -0.98 |
| 2 | 288,750 | 0 | 288,750 | 5,250,000 | 0.47 |
| 3 | 287,701 | 42,027 | 329,728 | 5,207,973 | 1.10 |
| 4 | 285,330 | 44,398 | 329,728 | 5,163,575 | 1.27 |
| 5 | 282,826 | 46,902 | 329,728 | 5,116,672 | 1.32 |
| 6 | 280,180 | 49,548 | 329,728 | 5,067,124 | 1.36 |
| 7 | 277,385 | 52,343 | 329,728 | 5,014,781 | 1.41 |
| 8 | 274,433 | 55,295 | 329,728 | 4,959,486 | 1.35 |
| 9 | 271,314 | 58,415 | 329,728 | 4,901,071 | 1.40 |
| 10 | 268,019 | 61,710 | 329,728 | 4,839,362 | 1.46 |
All figures in this table are modelled. DSCR is project NOI (EBIDA) over CF debt service. The ramp reserve, not operations, covers Years 1 and 2. Year 3, at 1.10, is the year to watch: close to full productivity, amortization started, little room for a late hire.
For a nonprofit borrower, project DSCR is only half the test. A nonprofit pays no income tax and carries depreciation as a large non-cash expense. Its coverage is therefore usually measured as change in unrestricted net assets plus depreciation, amortization and interest, divided by debt service on all of its obligations. A lender would want that borrower-wide figure for three historical years and a forecast that includes this clinic's ramp losses. The reason is simple: in Years 1 and 2 the clinic draws $723,074 of cash after debt service. If the reserve is spent early, the parent's other programs must cover the gap. Restricted gifts and pledges should be excluded from coverage, because they cannot pay debt.
| Year 4 test | Visits needed | Share of plan | Revenue | NOI |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| NOI break-even | 16,629 | 80.8% | $2,954,784 | $0 |
| DSCR 1.00 | 19,726 | 95.9% | $3,354,913 | $329,728 |
| DSCR 1.20 | 20,346 | 98.9% | $3,434,938 | $395,674 |
| DSCR 1.25 | 20,501 | 99.6% | $3,454,945 | $412,160 |
All figures in this table are modelled. Holding costs fixed, revenue must reach 97.4% of plan to cover debt service and 99.3% for 1.20. Volume break-even is slightly more forgiving because the cost-based AIR rises per visit when visits fall. The most important fact about this credit is that the clinic can lose only about 4% of planned visits before it stops covering debt service. Staffing is fixed, and in a rural clinic the provider is usually the reason the volume exists.
Returns
| Measure | Value |
|---|---|
| Total project cost / equity (time 0) | $8,738,938 / $3,488,938 |
| Year 11 NOI | $498,166 |
| Exit value at 8.50% cap (assumption) | $5,860,776 |
| Exit value net of 3% sale cost | $5,684,953 |
| Loan balance, end of Year 10 | $4,839,362 |
| Unlevered IRR, 10 years | 0.41% |
| Levered IRR, 10 years | -9.94% |
| Equity multiple | 0.29x |
| Equity payback within 10 years | Not reached |
| Exit value ÷ total cost / ÷ Year 10 loan balance | 0.671 / 1.211 |
All figures in this table are modelled. These returns fail any investment test, as expected: the equity is mission capital. Three points still matter to a lender. First, the clinic valued on its own income is worth about 67% of its cost, because working capital, pre-opening and financing costs create no collateral and primary care margins are thin. Second, collateral still covers the debt: going-concern value is 1.21 times the Year 10 balance, and an appraisal near the $6,033,000 real estate cost covers the original loan 1.15 times, meeting the CF appraisal test [2]. The margin is modest for a special-purpose building, so the loan should rest on the operator. Third, the equity does not come back: levered cash flows total $1,004,345 against $3,488,938 invested, so a lender should judge the borrower's liquidity after the contribution, not before.
Sensitivity and stress tests
CF rate against volume (Year 4 DSCR)
| Rate | Volume 90% | Volume 95% | Volume 100% | Volume 105% | Volume 110% |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 4.50% | 0.65 | 1.03 | 1.41 | 1.79 | 2.16 |
| 5.00% | 0.63 | 0.98 | 1.34 | 1.69 | 2.05 |
| 5.50% | 0.61 | 0.94 | 1.27 | 1.61 | 1.94 |
| 6.00% | 0.59 | 0.90 | 1.22 | 1.53 | 1.84 |
| 6.50% | 0.58 | 0.87 | 1.16 | 1.46 | 1.75 |
All figures in this table are modelled. Volume dominates. Moving from 4.50% to 6.50% costs 0.25 of DSCR at plan volume, while a 5% volume miss costs 0.29 to 0.38. On a 40-year amortization, rate barely moves debt service; fixed staffing makes volume decisive. Diligence belongs on recruitment and capture, not the rate tier.
Downside scenarios
| Scenario | DSCR Y3 | DSCR Y4 | DSCR Y6 | DSCR Y10 | Minimum, Y3 to Y10 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Base case | 1.10 | 1.27 | 1.36 | 1.46 | 1.10 |
| RHC status not obtained | -0.55 | -0.40 | -0.38 | -0.34 | -0.55 |
| ARHOME: 4 points of visits shift to self-pay | 0.81 | 0.97 | 1.04 | 1.09 | 0.81 |
| One APP vacant in Years 3 and 4 | 0.44 | 0.57 | 1.36 | 1.46 | 0.44 |
| Prime farmland: rate +2.00 points | 0.94 | 1.07 | 1.14 | 1.22 | 0.94 |
| Volume 15% below plan | 0.16 | 0.28 | 0.30 | 0.25 | 0.16 |
| Commercial and ARHOME rates 10% lower | 0.57 | 0.71 | 0.76 | 0.76 | 0.57 |
| Combined: ARHOME shift, APP vacancy, rate 6.25% | 0.21 | 0.31 | 0.97 | 1.02 | 0.21 |
All figures in this table are modelled.
- No RHC status. With Medicare and Medicaid at assumed fee-schedule averages of $112 and $85 a visit, Year 4 revenue falls to $2,913,497 and NOI to -$130,973. Because the model treats certification as unresolved until the clinic is open and surveyed, a lender cannot remove this risk before construction. It can only reduce it with location evidence and back it with recourse.
- ARHOME contraction. A four-point shift to self-pay costs about $100,000 of Year 4 revenue and holds DSCR under 1.0 until Year 6. That is a plausible result of the federal community engagement requirement [6], so the base payer mix is not conservative.
- APP vacancy. One lost APP removes about 3,450 visits a year while support staff stay. The rule that an NP, PA or certified nurse-midwife be available at least 50% of the time the clinic operates [15] must also be met from opening.
- Prime farmland. The two-point increase [2] cuts Year 4 DSCR to 1.07; site choice removes it.
- Volume and rate stresses. At a 12% margin, primary care cannot absorb a 15% volume miss or a 10% commercial rate cut, both normal outcomes for a new clinic.
- Combined. A realistic bad case leaves Years 3 and 4 at 0.21 and 0.31, recovering only to 1.02 by Year 10.
Program compliance
| Requirement | Rule | Status |
|---|---|---|
| Eligible applicant | Public body, not-for-profit organization or federally recognized tribe; non-utility applicants need significant ties with the local rural community [2] | Meets, subject to documents |
| Rural area | Not in a city or town over 20,000 by the most recent decennial census [2] | Meets: Greenbrier estimates base 5,726 [1] |
| Primarily rural service | Essential community facilities must primarily serve rural areas [2] | Meets: rural PSA [7] |
| Eligible purpose | Essential community facilities include health services [2] | Meets |
| Credit elsewhere | Applicant cannot finance from own resources or commercial credit at reasonable rates and terms [2] | Open |
| State health plan | Not inconsistent with the State Medical Facilities Plan; 1942.18(d)(4) standards [2] | Open |
| Environmental review | 7 CFR part 1970 [2] | Required |
| Rate tier | Income-tested tiers; +2 points on prime or unique farmland [2] | Market rate; in-town site |
| Term | Lesser of useful life, State statute or 40 years; deferral up to 36 months [2] | Meets: 40 years, 24 months |
| Security | Appraised value at least loan plus other debt; National Office concurrence if the applicant has existed less than five years [2] | Meets if operator history qualifies |
| Reserves | At least one average installment, accumulated at least one-tenth a year [2] | Modelled at 10% a year |
| Feasibility report | Qualified firm or individual without a direct interest in management or construction, where the project significantly affects the applicant's finances [2] | Required |
| CF grant | Income below 60/70/80/90% of the State nonmetropolitan median by population tier [3] | Not assumed |
| RHC location | Rural area (not urbanized) designated as a shortage area [15] | Rural; designation unconfirmed |
| RHC staffing | NP, PA or CNM at least 50% of operating time; at least one NP or PA employed [15] | Meets in plan |
| RHC services | Basic on-site lab tests; emergency procedures and drugs [15] | Meets in plan |
| Medicare payment | AIR limit $190 in 2028, then MEI [4] | Modelled |
Priority scoring is modest [2]: no population points (above 5,500); no income points (above 100% of the nonmetropolitan median); 5 points for health care; possibly 10 for a "truly rural" area unless the State Office treats Greenbrier as adjacent to or closely associated with Conway; and 5 or 10 for joint financing of 5% to 19% or of 20% or more. A second lender would raise the score but would take at least a parity position on shared security [2] and add debt service to a thin DSCR.
Risks and mitigants
| Risk | Effect (model) | Mitigant | Residual |
|---|---|---|---|
| RHC location not approved | NOI negative every year | Census block check; shortage-area designation and date in writing; parent support until certification | High |
| Volume shortfall or slow ramp | 5% miss gives 0.94 | Signed providers; employer and school outreach; $1.2M ramp reserve | High |
| Provider recruitment | Vacancy gives 0.44 to 0.57 | Recruitment and locum budget | Medium-high |
| ARHOME coverage losses | 4-point shift gives 0.97 | Enrollment help; sliding fee; tracking of the federal requirement [6] | Medium |
| Commercial rates or new competitor | 10% cut gives 0.71 | Contracts before opening; behavioral health and care management | Medium |
| Construction cost | Hard cost above the $385 assumption | Contingency, fixed price, bonds | Medium |
| Rate change before closing | 6.50% gives 1.16 | Lower of approval or closing rate [2] | Low-medium |
| Medicare rate reconciliation | Rate set on estimates and adjusted during the period [5] | Experienced cost report preparer | Low-medium |
| Collateral shortfall | Going-concern value 67% of cost | Borrower-level recourse | Medium |
Model determination
As structured, the modelled clinic is financeable as the obligation of an established nonprofit operator, but not as a stand-alone single-clinic borrower.
The project meets CF tests on applicant, rural location, population and purpose. It fits the 40-year term and deferral rules, and collateral covers the loan at cost. Its operating case reaches 1.27 in Year 4 and 1.46 by Year 10, which would satisfy most program lenders if the forecast were secure. It is not secure. Debt service breaks even at 95.9% of planned visits. Each of four realistic stresses takes coverage below 1.0, and loss of RHC status, which stays unresolved until the clinic is open, ends repayment capacity. A CF grant appears unavailable at the service area's income.
A lender would likely set conditions along these lines:
- Location evidence before the letter of conditions: a census-block finding that the site is outside the Conway urban area, and written confirmation of a qualifying shortage-area designation current through the expected certification date, or a filed designation application.
- Borrower-level support: the loan made to, or guaranteed by, an operator with at least five years of financially successful operation, which also avoids the National Office concurrence the rule requires for younger applicants [2], with a borrower-wide coverage covenant (for example 1.25x) and minimum days cash on hand (for example 90) after the equity contribution.
- Equity in hand: the $3,488,938, including the $1,200,000 ramp reserve, deposited or committed before construction, with campaign pledges discounted.
- Providers signed: the Year 1 roster (1.0 physician, 2.5 APP) under agreement before contract award, with the 50% APP availability rule documented [15].
- Site: an in-town parcel in a district that permits clinic use [16], confirmed free of prime or unique farmland before the rate is set [2].
- Reserves and reporting: the RD reserve as the letter of conditions requires [2]; quarterly visit, payer-mix and productivity reports in Years 1 to 4; timely cost reports.
- Rate protection: a written request for the lower of the approval-date or closing-date rate [2].
With these conditions, the credit rests on the operator's balance sheet during the ramp and on the clinic's own cash flow after Year 4, a sound pattern for a rural health facility. Without them, a lender would be financing a 12% margin business with a 4% cushion on volume.
Frequently Asked Questions
- Why does this model use Greenbrier rather than a smaller Faulkner County town?
- Greenbrier is the largest town under the 20,000 population limit, with a 2025 estimate of 6,645, and it grew about 16% from its April 2020 estimates base. It sits outside the Conway urban area and anchors a rural catchment to the north with no health care establishments listed in 2023 Census ZIP Code Business Patterns. The cost is CF priority scoring: projects in communities of 5,500 or fewer earn 20 population points, which Vilonia would earn and Greenbrier probably would not.
- Can the clinic get a USDA Community Facilities grant as well as the loan?
- Probably not. CF grant shares are graduated by community size and by the service area's median household income relative to the Arkansas nonmetropolitan median, and the highest-income tier stops at 90% of that median. Greenbrier's median household income of $57,214 would fail unless the nonmetropolitan median exceeded $63,571, which is above the $60,773 median of all Arkansas households in the same ACS 5-year data. The model treats any grant as upside, not as part of the structure.
- What is the all-inclusive rate, and why does it matter to the lender?
- Medicare pays an independent RHC a rate per visit set from its estimated allowable costs divided by estimated visits, capped by a per-visit limit of $165 in 2026, $178 in 2027 and $190 in 2028 that rises with the Medicare Economic Index afterwards. In this model the limit binds only in Year 1. After that, Medicare reimburses modelled cost, including depreciation and interest. That makes Medicare revenue predictable but low-margin, so the clinic's ability to repay depends mainly on commercial and ARHOME patients.
- Why is RHC certification such a large risk if the site looks rural?
- Two tests apply: the site must be in a rural area, meaning outside a Census urbanized area, and that area must be designated as a shortage area. The model treats both as unresolved until the clinic is open and certified. Losing RHC status makes modelled NOI negative, so a lender needs documented evidence on both tests and operator support until certification.
- How much debt can the clinic support?
- At an assumed 5.50% market rate over 40 years, a $5,250,000 loan gives a modelled 1.27 DSCR in the first stabilized year. A $4,500,000 loan gives 1.45 but needs about $4.1 million of equity. Even the smallest loan tested falls to 1.16 with a 5% volume shortfall. The debt therefore needs support at the borrower level, not just a smaller amount.
- How does the Medicaid work requirement affect the forecast?
- Federal law requires states, no later than the first quarter that begins after December 31, 2026, to make Medicaid eligibility for expansion adults depend on 80 hours a month of work, community service or a work program, half-time education, or equivalent earnings. Arkansas covers those adults through ARHOME. Patients who lose coverage move from a paying class to sliding-fee self-pay. In the model, a four-point shift of visits from ARHOME to self-pay lowers Year 4 DSCR from 1.27 to 0.97, which is why payer-mix reporting is a recommended loan covenant.
- Why does the site need to avoid farmland?
- Under 7 CFR 1942.17(f)(5), the CF interest rate rises by two percentage points when an essential community facility project involves the use of, or construction on, prime or unique farmland. In the model, that change lowers Year 4 DSCR from 1.27 to 1.07. An in-town parcel already zoned for office or commercial use avoids the penalty and is likely to need fewer approvals from the Greenbrier Planning Commission.
- Is a negative levered IRR a reason to decline the loan?
- No. The equity is nonprofit mission capital and expects no market return. The negative modelled IRR shows that the borrower's contribution will not come back, which matters when judging the borrower's remaining liquidity. The lender's tests are debt coverage, collateral and borrower strength. In the model, collateral covers the loan: real estate cost of $6.03 million against a $5.25 million loan, and going-concern value 1.21 times the Year 10 balance.
Sources
- 1.U.S. Census Bureau. "Annual Estimates of the Resident Population for Incorporated Places and Minor Civil Divisions: April 1, 2020 to July 1, 2025, Arkansas" (Vintage 2025, sub-est2025_5.csv). https://www2.census.gov/programs-surveys/popest/datasets/2020-2025/cities/totals/sub-est2025_5.csv (accessed 2026-11-11)
- 2.U.S. Government Publishing Office, GovInfo. Code of Federal Regulations, Title 7, Part 1942, Subpart A, Community Facility Loans (revised as of January 1, 2025). https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/CFR-2025-title7-vol13/xml/CFR-2025-title7-vol13-part1942.xml (accessed 2026-11-11)
- 3.U.S. Government Publishing Office, GovInfo. Code of Federal Regulations, Title 7, Part 3570, Community Programs, Subpart B, Community Facilities Grant Program (revised as of January 1, 2026). https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/CFR-2026-title7-vol15/xml/CFR-2026-title7-vol15-part3570.xml (accessed 2026-11-11)
- 4.U.S. Government Publishing Office, GovInfo. 42 CFR 405.2462, Payment to independent RHCs that are authorized to bill under the reasonable cost system (revised as of October 1, 2025). https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/CFR-2025-title42-vol2/xml/CFR-2025-title42-vol2-sec405-2462.xml (accessed 2026-11-11)
- 5.U.S. Government Publishing Office, GovInfo. 42 CFR 405.2464, Payment rate (revised as of October 1, 2025). https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/CFR-2025-title42-vol2/xml/CFR-2025-title42-vol2-sec405-2464.xml (accessed 2026-11-11)
- 6.U.S. Government Publishing Office, GovInfo. Public Law 119-21, section 71119, "Requirement for States to Establish Medicaid Community Engagement Requirements for Certain Individuals." https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/PLAW-119publ21/html/PLAW-119publ21.htm (accessed 2026-11-11)
- 7.U.S. Census Bureau. "2020 Census Urban and Rural Population by County" (2020_UA_COUNTY.xlsx). https://www2.census.gov/geo/docs/reference/ua/2020_UA_COUNTY.xlsx (accessed 2026-11-11)
- 8.U.S. Census Bureau. "2020 Census Urban Areas" list (2020_Census_ua_list_all.xlsx). https://www2.census.gov/geo/docs/reference/ua/2020_Census_ua_list_all.xlsx (accessed 2026-11-11)
- 9.U.S. Census Bureau. "ZIP Code Business Patterns 2023," detail file (zbp23detail.zip). https://www2.census.gov/programs-surveys/cbp/datasets/2023/zbp23detail.zip (accessed 2026-11-11)
- 10.U.S. Census Bureau. "Annual County Resident Population Estimates by Age and Sex: April 1, 2020 to July 1, 2025, Arkansas" (Vintage 2025, cc-est2025-agesex-05.csv). https://www2.census.gov/programs-surveys/popest/datasets/2020-2025/counties/asrh/cc-est2025-agesex-05.csv (accessed 2026-11-11)
- 11.U.S. Census Bureau. American Community Survey 2024 1-year table-based summary file, tables B19013, B19301, B17001, B11001, B15003, B09001 and B01003. https://www2.census.gov/programs-surveys/acs/summary_file/2024/table-based-SF/data/1YRData/ (accessed 2026-11-11)
- 12.U.S. Census Bureau. "County Business Patterns 2023," county file (cbp23co.zip). https://www2.census.gov/programs-surveys/cbp/datasets/2023/cbp23co.zip (accessed 2026-11-11)
- 13.U.S. Census Bureau. American Community Survey 2020 to 2024 5-year table-based summary file, tables B01003, B09001, B09020 and B19013. https://www2.census.gov/programs-surveys/acs/summary_file/2024/table-based-SF/data/5YRData/ (accessed 2026-11-11)
- 14.U.S. Census Bureau. "Small Area Health Insurance Estimates: 2024" (sahie-2024-csv.zip). https://www2.census.gov/programs-surveys/sahie/datasets/time-series/estimates-acs/sahie-2024-csv.zip (accessed 2026-11-11)
- 15.U.S. Government Publishing Office, GovInfo. 42 CFR part 491, Certification of Certain Health Facilities, Subpart A, Rural Health Clinics (revised as of October 1, 2025). https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/CFR-2025-title42-vol5/xml/CFR-2025-title42-vol5-part491.xml (accessed 2026-11-11)
- 16.City of Greenbrier, Arkansas. "Planning & Zoning." https://www.greenbrierar.gov/planning-zoning (accessed 2026-11-11)
- 17.Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System. "H.15 Selected Interest Rates (Daily)," release of November 10, 2026. https://www.federalreserve.gov/releases/h15/ (accessed 2026-11-11)
- 18.U.S. Government Publishing Office, GovInfo. 42 CFR 405.2468, Allowable costs (revised as of October 1, 2025). https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/CFR-2025-title42-vol2/xml/CFR-2025-title42-vol2-sec405-2468.xml (accessed 2026-11-11)
Related
- K-8 Charter School in Wickenburg, Arizona: A USDA Community Facilities Direct Loan Model Study
- Acquiring a General Dental Practice in King County, Washington: An SBA 7(a) Model Study
- What is a bankable feasibility study?
- Bankable feasibility study framework
- Medical Office feasibility study
- Skilled Nursing feasibility study
- Charter School feasibility study
- Retail feasibility study