Model study: an illustrative feasibility analysis built on public data for Loudoun County, Virginia; not a client engagement.
Project summary
| Item | Modelled value |
|---|---|
| Asset | New-construction extended-stay hotel, upper-midscale extended-stay brand class (no named brand), studio and one-bedroom suites with full kitchens |
| Size | 110 keys; four stories; 66,000 gross square feet on 2.4 acres |
| Location | Eastern Loudoun County, Virginia (Dulles, Sterling and Ashburn corridor) |
| Program | SBA 504 (13 CFR part 120 [1]; SBA SOP 50 10 8.1, effective October 1, 2026 [2]) |
| Total project cost | $23,772,545 ($216,114 per key) |
| Loan structure | Bank first lien $14,150,066 (59.5%); 504 net debenture $4,867,970 (20.5%) on a $5,000,000 gross debenture; borrower cash $4,754,509 (20.0%) |
| Stabilized DSCR | 1.29x in Year 4 on NOI after a 4% FF&E reserve; 1.16x in Year 2; 0.90x in Year 1 |
| IRR | 9.4% unlevered; 14.8% levered; 4.25x equity multiple |
| Determination | Financeable with conditions: a funded Year 1 shortfall reserve, sponsor liquidity, a documented job-opportunity or public-policy basis for the full debenture, and proof that transient guests produce more than half of revenue |
The credit question
A lender reviewing a file like this is not being asked whether Loudoun County needs hotel rooms. The county holds about half of Virginia's data center industry [3], sits beside Washington Dulles International Airport, and had a 2024 median household income of $177,457 [4]. The question is narrower. Can a newly formed operating company open a 110-key extended-stay hotel into a corridor where comparable product is still being added, and cover by its second year a capital stack that SBA's rules make heavier than a typical real estate loan?
Four things have to be true. First, demand has to persist through the ramp-up. Much of it is tied to data center construction, which is large today but is construction-phase demand, not operating demand. Second, the hotel has to earn a rate that clears its cost. At about $216,000 per key, the model needs an ADR in the low $170s at 78% occupancy to reach 1.25x coverage. Third, the structure has to fit the rules. SBA treats a hotel as limited or special purpose property and a newly formed operating company as a new business [2], which together push the borrower contribution to 20% [1]; and at a cost near $24 million, the $5,000,000 debenture limit binds [1]. Fourth, the hotel has to stay eligible: SBA requires more than half of revenue to come from transients who stay 30 days or less, and a start-up must show it in its projections [2]. That is a real constraint for a product whose best customers are crews on multi-month assignments.
Location and county economy
Loudoun County sits at the western edge of the Washington metropolitan area, with Dulles International Airport on its eastern edge and the Route 28, Route 7 and Dulles Greenway corridors running through its eastern half.
| Indicator | Value | Source |
|---|---|---|
| Population, July 1, 2025 (Census estimate) | 449,749 | [5] |
| Population, July 1, 2020 (Census estimate) | 422,693 | [5] |
| Growth, 2020 to 2025 | 6.4% (1.25% a year) | computed from [5] |
| Population change, 2024 and 2025 | 6,963 and 6,000 | [5] |
| Median household income, 2024 (SAIPE) | $177,457 | [4] |
| Loudoun share of Virginia's data center industry | About half, by sites, building square footage and estimated energy use | [3] |
Population and households. The Census series shows Loudoun adding 6,963 residents in 2024 and 6,000 in 2025 [5]. For a hotel, residents matter through the visiting-relatives and relocation segments. A family relocating for a job may spend weeks house-hunting, and a suite with a kitchen is a common bridge.
Income. Median household income of $177,457 in 2024 [4] supports weekend rate, which is where extended-stay hotels near business districts are usually weakest.
Construction and the data center economy. Construction is the part of the economy that matters most for this hotel. JLARC estimates that Virginia's data center industry supports about 74,000 jobs a year, and that 59,000 of them, 80% of the total, come from the construction phase [3]. A data center building usually takes about 12 to 18 months to build, and about 1,500 workers are on site at the height of construction [3]. Those travelling electrical, mechanical and commissioning crews are the core extended-stay customer here. Data centers also matter to the county budget: JLARC puts data center revenue at 31% of Loudoun's total local tax revenue [3].
Federal travel. Federal exposure matters for this hotel because contractor travel is a segment whose rate is capped by the per diem.
Access. The network that brings visitors in matters more for a hotel than the commute. The Silver Line extension opened on November 15, 2022, adding stations at Ashburn, Loudoun Gateway and Washington Dulles International Airport [6]. That produces crew, disrupted-traveler and inbound business demand within a short drive of any site in the corridor.
Visitor economy. Statewide, visitors spent a record $35.1 billion in Virginia in 2024, up 5.4% from $33.3 billion in 2023 [7]. County-level hotel occupancy for Loudoun comes from paid data this model study does not use, so the model treats market occupancy as an assumption and tests it in the stress cases.
What the economy means for this asset. The county's growth is real but uneven in ways that matter for a hotel. Residents and income support weekend and relocation demand. Data center construction supports midweek and long-stay demand at volume. Federal travel is capped by the per diem. The model therefore treats Loudoun's strength as a reason to expect stable base demand, not as a reason to assume premium rates.
Market analysis
Demand drivers
Extended-stay hotels sell length of stay: guests take a suite for a week, a month or longer because their work or life is in transition in that place.
| Driver | Evidence | Meaning for the hotel | Source |
|---|---|---|---|
| Data center construction | About 74,000 Virginia jobs a year from the industry, 59,000 of them in the construction phase; about 1,500 workers on site at the height of a building's construction; Loudoun holds about half the industry | Multi-month stays by electrical, mechanical and commissioning crews; the largest segment, but it ends when building stops | [3] |
| Data center operations | Data center revenue equal to 31% of Loudoun's total local tax revenue | Recurring vendor and technician travel | [3] |
| Dulles Airport and Metrorail | Silver Line stations at the airport, Loudoun Gateway and Ashburn since November 15, 2022 | Crew contracts, disrupted travelers, inbound corporate guests | [6] |
| Federal agencies and contractors | FY2027 lodging per diem of $121 a night in Loudoun | Project travel reimbursed at the per diem | [8] |
| Relocation and household growth | Population up 6.4% from 2020 to 2025; median household income of $177,457 in 2024 | Relocating staff and families needing 30 to 90 days of housing | [5], [4] |
| Leisure | Record $35.1 billion of visitor spending in Virginia in 2024 | Weekend and summer fill; family and wedding blocks | [7] |
The data center pipeline is large but not guaranteed. JLARC finds that most of the industry's economic benefit comes from the construction phase rather than from ongoing operations [3]. Power is a real constraint: in 2022 the electric utility paused new data center loads in Loudoun County for three months while it worked on transmission constraints [3]. The most valuable segment today is also the one most exposed to a pause in permitting, power or tenant demand, so the model holds it to 32% of stabilized room nights and the stress tests cut it.
The federal per diem caps a segment's rate. GSA's FY2027 lodging per diem for Loudoun is $121 a night in every month [8], up from $115 in FY2026 [9]. Federal travelers, and contractors following federal travel rules, will not pay more. The model prices this segment at $136 in 2031 (per diem rising about 3% a year, an assumption) and keeps it at 10% of room nights.
Existing supply and pipeline
A competitive census of eastern Loudoun's extended-stay hotels is a paid product this model study does not use, so supply is built from an assumed existing base plus assumed additions.
| Property or item | Rooms | Status | Treatment in model | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Existing extended-stay competitive set, eastern Loudoun | 1,050 (assumption) | Operating | Base supply in 2026 | Assumption; see Assumptions table |
| Home2 Suites by Hilton, Ashburn (extended-stay design, across from One Loudoun) | 122 | Open, per its owner's release | Included in the 1,050 base | [10] |
| Additional economy extended-stay hotel | 123 (assumption) | Assumed pipeline addition | Added in 2028 | Assumption |
| Additional lifestyle hotel, not extended-stay | 169 (assumption) | Assumed pipeline addition | Added in 2028 at 25% weight (42 room-equivalents) as a secondary competitor | Assumption |
| Subject hotel | 110 | Modelled | Added in 2029 | This model study |
The one documented opening says something about the competition even without a full census. The Home2 Suites in Ashburn is a 122-room hotel with an extended-stay design and in-room kitchens, across from the One Loudoun mixed-use district and less than 10 miles from Dulles, and its owner's release ties the location to the data center market [10]. It is the closest analogue to the modelled hotel. The two assumed additions stand for the kind of projects that may follow: a smaller-format economy extended-stay hotel competing mainly on price for crews, and a lifestyle hotel competing for short corporate stays and weekend leisure. A new upper-midscale hotel would sit between those products on rate.
No public source gives extended-stay occupancy for this corridor. The 75% market occupancy for 2026 is therefore a model assumption, and the stress tests show what happens if it is too high.
Demand method: segmentation, latent demand and penetration
The method is a supply and demand model of the competitive set, followed by a fair-share and penetration test for the subject. Base demand in 2026 is the assumed 1,050 rooms at an assumed 75% occupancy, or 287,438 room nights, split into five segments grown at assumed rates tied to their drivers:
- Data center construction: 30% of demand, growing 6% a year through 2029, then 4%, 4%, 3% and 3%, reflecting continued construction.
- Corporate and technology transient: 28%, growing 3%.
- Airport-related: 10%, growing 4.5%, with only part of airport traffic converting to hotel nights here.
- Federal and contractor: 12%, falling 2% in 2027 and 1% in 2028, flat in 2029, then growing 1%, reflecting federal spending restraint.
- Leisure, relocation and group: 20%, growing 2.5%.
Latent demand (guests now turned away midweek to Herndon, Reston or short-term rentals) is 5% of 2026 demand, or 14,372 room nights, recaptured half in 2028 and fully from 2029. Induced demand of 3,000 room nights a year from 2029 reflects a new branded-class product's distribution. Both are assumptions.
| Year | Competitive rooms | Available room nights | Base demand | Latent and induced | Total demand | Market occupancy | Subject penetration | Subject occupancy |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026 | 1,050 | 383,250 | 287,438 | 0 | 287,438 | 75.0% | n/a | n/a |
| 2027 | 1,050 | 383,250 | 297,067 | 0 | 297,067 | 77.5% | n/a | n/a |
| 2028 | 1,215 | 443,475 | 307,525 | 7,186 | 314,711 | 71.0% | n/a | n/a |
| 2029 | 1,325 | 483,625 | 318,822 | 17,372 | 336,194 | 69.5% | 92% | 64% |
| 2030 | 1,325 | 483,625 | 328,927 | 17,372 | 346,299 | 71.6% | 103% | 74% |
| 2031 | 1,325 | 483,625 | 339,384 | 17,372 | 356,756 | 73.8% | 106% | 78% |
| 2032 | 1,325 | 483,625 | 349,095 | 17,372 | 366,466 | 75.8% | 103% | 78% |
| 2033 | 1,325 | 483,625 | 359,106 | 17,372 | 376,478 | 77.8% | 100% | 78% |
All figures in this table are modelled. Base demand compounds at 3.23% a year, but supply grows 26% between 2027 and 2029, so market occupancy falls from 77.5% to 69.5% in the opening year and recovers gradually. That is the key market result: the hotel opens into a temporarily oversupplied corridor. Its first-year 64% equals 92% penetration, typical for a new hotel building its base. By 2031 it needs 106% penetration to reach 78%, a modest premium that new product with full kitchens can plausibly earn over older hotels. The model then holds the subject at 78% as the market tightens, because a market near 78% would invite a new competitor.
Segment mix and rate at stabilization
| Segment (Year 3, 2031) | Share of room nights | Room nights | ADR | Share of room revenue | Share of segment nights at 30+ nights |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Data center construction and commissioning | 32% | 10,021 | $158 | 29.58% | 75% |
| Corporate and technology transient | 27% | 8,456 | $189 | 29.85% | 10% |
| Airport-related | 9% | 2,819 | $172 | 9.06% | 0% |
| Federal government and contractor | 10% | 3,132 | $136 | 7.96% | 0% |
| Leisure, relocation and group | 22% | 6,889 | $183 | 23.55% | 15% |
| Total / weighted (modelled) | 100% | 31,317 | $170.93 | 100.00% | 30% of nights |
The segment rates follow the guest. Data center crews book in volume through their employers and negotiate monthly rates, so their ADR sits below the hotel average even though they fill the most nights. Corporate and technology travelers on short trips pay the highest rates, and leisure and relocation guests pay near the top on weekends and in summer. Federal and contractor guests pay the per diem. The weighted ADR of $170.93 is carried as $171.00 in the pro forma. On these assumptions, stays of 30 nights or longer produce 28.7% of room revenue, and stays of 30 nights or less produce 71.3%. That 21-point cushion over SBA's 50% transient-revenue threshold [2] is the figure a CDC will test, and it is discussed under program compliance.
Forecast
The subject forecast is 64% at $158 in 2029, 74% at $165 in 2030 and 78% at $171 in 2031, with ADR growing 3% a year after that. The 2031 rate is about $147 in 2026 dollars, above the $121 per diem [8]. In a corridor dominated by construction and contractor demand, this hotel is a value product with a kitchen, not a rate leader.
Site and technical
Site requirements. The model assumes a 2.4-acre pad near Route 28 or Route 7 with public water and sewer, arterial visibility, and 120 to 130 surface spaces, including truck-friendly spaces for crews. A site near the Ashburn or Loudoun Gateway Metrorail stations [6] would favor corporate and leisure guests; one near the data center campuses would favor crews and lower land cost. The $1.0 million per acre land price is an assumption to be replaced with closed sales.
Zoning and permits. The budget assumes a site where a hotel is permitted by right, with no added amenity package, buffer or special exception. The parcel's zoning district, its by-right status and any use-specific standards for hotels are gating diligence items: a special exception adds months and hearing risk, and required amenities such as meeting space add cost the budget does not carry.
Construction approach. The model assumes a four-story, interior-corridor building of 66,000 gross square feet (600 per key), wood frame over slab, with studio and one-bedroom suites with full kitchens, guest laundry, breakfast area, fitness room and 24-hour market. Building cost of $205 per square foot plus $1,350,000 of site work totals $14,880,000, or $225 per square foot; both are assumptions for a high-cost county, to be replaced with contractor pricing. At $216,114 per key, the modelled cost reflects an upper-midscale product. The contract should be a guaranteed maximum price with payment and performance bonds. For new construction, SBA requires an appraisal of market value at completion, and after completion the CDC must obtain a statement that the building was built with only minor deviations from the plans and specifications [2]; before the debenture is issued, the CDC must also certify completion in accordance with the final plans and specifications [1].
Schedule. Site control and design run from Q4 2026 to Q2 2027, and site plan, permits and the bank and 504 approvals to Q3 2027. Closing and an 18-month build follow, with pre-opening hiring in Q4 2028, opening in January 2029 (Year 1) and stabilization in Year 3 (2031).
Development budget and sources and uses
| Line item | Amount | Per key | Share |
|---|---|---|---|
| Land (2.4 acres at $1.00M/acre) | $2,400,000 | $21,818 | 10.1% |
| Site work and utilities | $1,350,000 | $12,273 | 5.7% |
| Building hard cost (66,000 gsf at $205/sf) | $13,530,000 | $123,000 | 56.9% |
| Hard-cost contingency (5%) | $744,000 | $6,764 | 3.1% |
| Architecture, engineering, interiors | $690,000 | $6,273 | 2.9% |
| Permits, utility availability and tap fees | $560,000 | $5,091 | 2.4% |
| Legal, title, survey, environmental, geotech, appraisal, market study | $265,000 | $2,409 | 1.1% |
| Builder's risk, construction monitoring | $170,000 | $1,545 | 0.7% |
| Brand application and technical services | $95,000 | $864 | 0.4% |
| Soft-cost contingency (5%) | $89,000 | $809 | 0.4% |
| FF&E ($15,500/key) | $1,705,000 | $15,500 | 7.2% |
| OS&E ($3,800/key) | $418,000 | $3,800 | 1.8% |
| Pre-opening expenses | $420,000 | $3,818 | 1.8% |
| Working capital | $150,000 | $1,364 | 0.6% |
| Construction-period interest (interim at 8.00%) | $1,043,910 | $9,490 | 4.4% |
| Bank commitment and interim fees (0.75%) | $142,635 | $1,297 | 0.6% |
| Total project cost (modelled) | $23,772,545 | $216,114 | 100.0% |
Construction interest is computed monthly: land and 10% of other costs fund at closing, the rest draws evenly over 18 months, borrower cash goes in first, and interest at 8.00% (a prime rate of 7.00% in November 2026 [11] plus an assumed 1.00%) accrues on the drawn balance. The 5% contingency is inside the 10% ceiling on contingency reserves in 13 CFR 120.882(b) [1].
| Source | Amount | Share of project cost | Lien / basis |
|---|---|---|---|
| Third Party Lender first-lien loan | $14,150,066 | 59.5% | First lien; at least 50% required [1] |
| 504 net debenture proceeds (CDC/SBA) | $4,867,970 | 20.5% | Second lien; capped by $5.0M gross |
| Borrower equity (cash) | $4,754,509 | 20.0% | 20% minimum (new business and special purpose property) |
| Total sources | $23,772,545 | 100.0% | Modelled |
| 504 administrative costs financed in debenture | $132,030 | outside project cost | Added to gross debenture |
| Gross debenture | $5,000,000 | n/a | Counts against the $5,000,000 limit |
The debenture cap check
SBA's limit applies to the gross debenture: net proceeds plus the eligible administrative costs financed with them, and only the 504 loans of the borrower and its affiliates count toward it [2]. Under 13 CFR 120.931, the outstanding 504 balance for a borrower and its affiliates is limited to $5,000,000, rising to $5,500,000 per project only for small manufacturers and certain energy projects [1]. Neither exception applies: a hotel is not a manufacturer in NAICS 31 to 33, and SOP 50 10 8.1 bars new businesses from the energy-reduction goal [2]. Using the SOP's pricing steps [2], the model solves backwards from the limit: a net debenture of $4,867,970 plus the 0.50% guaranty fee ($24,339.85), the 0.25% funding fee ($12,169.93) and the 1.50% CDC processing fee ($73,019.55) [1], plus an assumed $2,500 of closing costs, is $4,979,999.32. Divided by 0.996, the SOP's step for the fee charged when a 20- or 25-year debenture is sold, and rounded up to the next even thousand [2], that is exactly $5,000,000.
| Test | Result (modelled) |
|---|---|
| Project cost | $23,772,545 |
| 30% debenture ceiling for new business plus special purpose (net) | $7,131,764 |
| Gross debenture that ceiling would require | $7,326,000 |
| Regulatory limit (13 CFR 120.931(a)) | $5,000,000 |
| Largest net debenture that fits under $5,000,000 gross | $4,867,970 |
| 504 share of project cost after the cap | 20.5% |
| Amount shifted from the 504 tranche to the bank | $2,263,794 |
| Bank share of project cost after the shift | 59.5% |
| Project cost at which the cap starts to bind (30% net = max net) | $16,226,567 |
The cap binds above about $16.2 million of cost, and this project is $7.5 million past that. The effect is not on coverage: with the 504 rate one point below the bank rate, moving $2.26 million to the bank adds about $12,000 of annual debt service. The effect is on the bank, which carries 59.5% of cost instead of 50%, a 56.5% loan-to-value at stabilization. Banks that cap hotel first liens at lower loan-to-value ratios may decline, so the cap narrows the lender pool more than it changes the numbers. The rules allow it: 13 CFR 120.920(a) sets 50% as a floor for the third-party loan, not a ceiling [1].
Revenue build and operating expenses
Ramp to stabilization
| Year | Occupancy | ADR | RevPAR | Occupied room nights | Rooms revenue | Other revenue | Total revenue |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Year 1 (2029) | 64% | $158.00 | $101.12 | 25,696 | $4,059,968 | $101,499 | $4,161,467 |
| Year 2 (2030) | 74% | $165.00 | $122.10 | 29,711 | $4,902,315 | $122,558 | $5,024,873 |
| Year 3 (2031) | 78% | $171.00 | $133.38 | 31,317 | $5,355,207 | $133,880 | $5,489,087 |
| Year 4 (2032) | 78% | $176.13 | $137.38 | 31,317 | $5,515,863 | $137,897 | $5,653,760 |
All figures are modelled. Year 1 occupancy of 64% reflects a hotel that opens in January, before contractor accounts, brand-loyalty guests and online review history have built up. Year 2 adds 4,015 occupied room nights as corporate and crew accounts sign, and Year 3 adds a further 1,606 as the hotel reaches its stabilized share. ADR rises faster than inflation in Years 1 to 3 because a new hotel discounts to win accounts, then reprices them at renewal. Total revenue per key moves from $37,832 in Year 1 to $51,398 in Year 4. A lender should ask for the monthly cash flow SBA requires for a new business, covering the first 12 months of operations or three months past break-even, whichever is longer [2], because January and February openings in this region carry winter seasonality.
Other revenue (market, laundry, pet and parking fees) is 2.5% of rooms revenue, suitable for a hotel without a restaurant. Occupancy and sales taxes collected from guests are pass-through items excluded from revenue. Monthly rates for contractors pull the mix toward 30-plus-night stays, which the model tracks.
Expense structure
Expenses are built by department: fixed amounts per key inflate 3% a year, and variable amounts follow occupied rooms or revenue. Year 4 (2032), modelled:
| Expense | Amount | % of revenue | Per key | Per occupied room |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Rooms department (labor, breakfast, supplies) | $889,744 | 15.7% | $8,089 | $28.41 |
| Other operated departments | $68,948 | 1.2% | $627 | $2.20 |
| Administrative and general | $425,595 | 7.5% | $3,869 | $13.59 |
| Sales and marketing (property level) | $168,946 | 3.0% | $1,536 | $5.39 |
| Franchise royalty, program and loyalty fees | $579,166 | 10.2% | $5,265 | $18.49 |
| Information and telecommunications | $114,190 | 2.0% | $1,038 | $3.65 |
| Repairs and maintenance | $228,380 | 4.0% | $2,076 | $7.29 |
| Utilities | $252,420 | 4.5% | $2,295 | $8.06 |
| Management fee (3.0% of revenue) | $169,613 | 3.0% | $1,542 | $5.42 |
| Real estate tax | $178,858 | 3.2% | $1,626 | $5.71 |
| Business personal property, BPOL and other taxes | $56,561 | 1.0% | $514 | $1.81 |
| Insurance | $168,280 | 3.0% | $1,530 | $5.37 |
| FF&E reserve (4.0% of revenue) | $226,150 | 4.0% | $2,056 | $7.22 |
| Total operating expenses | $3,526,851 | 62.4% | $32,062 | $112.62 |
| Net operating income | $2,126,909 | 37.6% | $19,336 | $67.92 |
Year 4 gross operating profit is $2,926,371, or 51.8% of revenue, after franchise fees. Notes on key lines:
- Rooms department at $26 per occupied room in 2029 dollars reflects weekly rather than daily housekeeping for long stays; it rises if the mix shifts to short stays.
- Franchise fees at 10.5% of rooms revenue are an assumed upper-midscale extended-stay fee load; replace with the actual franchise disclosure document.
- Real estate tax applies an assumed rate of $0.805 per $100 to an assessed value of $20,936,910 (cost less FF&E, OS&E, pre-opening, working capital and loan fees), growing 2% a year. The rate is to be confirmed with the county, and an income-based reassessment could move the tax.
- BPOL and business personal property taxes are carried as an assumed $400 per key plus 0.15% of revenue, to be replaced with the county's current rates.
- FF&E reserve ramps 2%, 3% and 4% of revenue in Years 1 to 3.
The resulting NOI margin of 37.6% is the number a reviewer should test against comparable extended-stay operating statements. It depends on the extended-stay labor model and on the absence of a restaurant. If the operator runs the hotel like a select-service property with daily housekeeping and a staffed bar, rooms and undistributed costs would rise several points, and the margin would fall toward the low 30s, which the expense stress in Scenario D partly captures.
10-year pro forma
| Line ($, modelled) | Y1 | Y2 | Y3 | Y4 | Y5 | Y6 | Y7 | Y8 | Y9 | Y10 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Occupancy | 64% | 74% | 78% | 78% | 78% | 78% | 78% | 78% | 78% | 78% |
| ADR | 158.00 | 165.00 | 171.00 | 176.13 | 181.41 | 186.86 | 192.46 | 198.24 | 204.18 | 210.31 |
| RevPAR | 101.12 | 122.10 | 133.38 | 137.38 | 141.50 | 145.75 | 150.12 | 154.62 | 159.26 | 164.04 |
| Rooms revenue | 4,059,968 | 4,902,315 | 5,355,207 | 5,515,863 | 5,681,339 | 5,851,779 | 6,027,333 | 6,208,153 | 6,394,397 | 6,586,229 |
| Other revenue | 101,499 | 122,558 | 133,880 | 137,897 | 142,033 | 146,294 | 150,683 | 155,204 | 159,860 | 164,656 |
| Total revenue | 4,161,467 | 5,024,873 | 5,489,087 | 5,653,760 | 5,823,372 | 5,998,073 | 6,178,016 | 6,363,357 | 6,554,257 | 6,750,885 |
| Departmental expenses | 718,846 | 856,940 | 930,769 | 958,692 | 987,454 | 1,017,077 | 1,047,590 | 1,079,017 | 1,111,387 | 1,144,729 |
| Undistributed expenses | 1,385,398 | 1,582,284 | 1,717,182 | 1,768,697 | 1,821,759 | 1,876,410 | 1,932,702 | 1,990,685 | 2,050,404 | 2,111,918 |
| Gross operating profit | 2,057,223 | 2,585,649 | 2,841,136 | 2,926,371 | 3,014,159 | 3,104,586 | 3,197,724 | 3,293,655 | 3,392,466 | 3,494,238 |
| Management fee | 124,844 | 150,746 | 164,673 | 169,613 | 174,701 | 179,942 | 185,340 | 190,901 | 196,628 | 202,527 |
| Property and other taxes | 218,784 | 224,770 | 230,264 | 235,419 | 240,692 | 246,089 | 251,611 | 257,261 | 263,043 | 268,959 |
| Insurance | 154,000 | 158,620 | 163,379 | 168,280 | 173,328 | 178,528 | 183,884 | 189,401 | 195,083 | 200,935 |
| FF&E reserve | 83,229 | 150,746 | 219,563 | 226,150 | 232,935 | 239,923 | 247,121 | 254,534 | 262,170 | 270,035 |
| Total expenses | 2,685,101 | 3,124,106 | 3,425,830 | 3,526,851 | 3,630,869 | 3,737,969 | 3,848,248 | 3,961,799 | 4,078,715 | 4,199,103 |
| Net operating income | 1,476,366 | 1,900,767 | 2,063,257 | 2,126,909 | 2,192,503 | 2,260,104 | 2,329,768 | 2,401,558 | 2,475,542 | 2,551,782 |
| Debt service (bank + 504) | 1,645,172 | 1,645,172 | 1,645,172 | 1,645,172 | 1,645,172 | 1,645,172 | 1,645,172 | 1,645,172 | 1,645,172 | 1,645,172 |
| Cash flow after debt service | -168,806 | 255,595 | 418,085 | 481,737 | 547,331 | 614,932 | 684,596 | 756,386 | 830,370 | 906,610 |
Undistributed expenses cover A&G, sales and marketing, franchise fees, IT, repairs and utilities. Each column ties: revenue less expenses equals NOI, and NOI less debt service equals cash flow. After Year 3 revenue and expenses both grow about 3%, so the NOI margin holds near 37.7% and ADR growth is the only source of NOI growth.
Debt structure under the 504 program
| Tranche | Amount | Rate (assumption) | Term / amortization | Annual debt service | Fees |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Interim construction loan (bank, covers bank and 504 portions) | $19,018,036 | 8.00% floating (prime 7.00% + 1.00%) | 18 months, interest only | Capitalized in budget | 0.75% commitment: $142,635 |
| Third Party Lender permanent loan | $14,150,066 | 7.40% fixed for 10 years | 10-year term, 25-year amortization | $1,243,789 | Included in 0.75% commitment fee |
| 504 debenture (gross) | $5,000,000 | 6.40% effective, fixed | 25-year, fully amortizing | $401,383 | $132,030 financed; ongoing fees in effective rate |
| Total permanent debt (modelled) | $19,150,066 | n/a | n/a | $1,645,172 | n/a |
Rule set. SOP 50 10 8.1 took effect October 1, 2026 for applications issued an SBA loan number on or after that date [12], building on SOP 50 10 8, effective June 1, 2025 [13]; a file submitted in 2027 would be reviewed under it.
Rates. Rates are assumptions anchored to sourced benchmarks. The 10-year Treasury constant maturity yield was 4.88% on November 9, 2026 [11]. SBA pegs 504 rates to an increment above the 10-year Treasury rate [14], and the SOP names the 10-year Treasury rate as the usual benchmark for 20- and 25-year debentures [2]. The assumed 6.40% effective 504 rate sits about 1.5 points above that yield, covering the debenture spread and ongoing fees, which regulation caps: a CDC servicing fee of 0.625% to 2% a year (above 1% outside rural areas needs SBA's prior approval) and an SBA annual fee of no more than 0.9375% [1]. The assumed 7.40% bank rate sits about 2.5 points above the same yield, fixed for 10 years; the interim loan floats at prime (7.00% [11]) plus an assumed 1.00%.
Funding sequence. The bank's interim loan funds the whole debt portion during construction, including the share the 504 debenture will later take out. After completion, the debenture is sold and its proceeds repay the interim financing, which 13 CFR 120.882(d) lists as an eligible 504 cost [1]. Unused contingency matters at that point: the debenture is reduced by the amount that the unused contingency reserve exceeds 2% of the anticipated debenture [1]. The interim lender carries the take-out risk if the project changes in a way the CDC cannot fund, so the bank will want the 504 authorization in hand before the first construction draw.
Terms and fees. SBA offers 10-, 20- and 25-year 504 maturities [14], and the 25-year debenture suits real estate. The bank's 10-year term meets the minimum for a third-party loan beside a 20- or 25-year debenture [1], [2]. The bank's 25-year amortization leaves a year-10 balloon, which the SOP requires the loan report to justify [2]. The CDC processing fee (up to 1.5%), SBA guaranty fee (0.5%) and funding fee (up to 0.25%) [1] are financed in the gross debenture. The bank's 0.75% fee is an assumption.
Equity injection and its basis. 13 CFR 120.910(a) sets the borrower contribution at 15% for a borrower that has operated for two years or less, 15% for a limited or single-purpose building, 20% when both apply and 10% in all other cases, measured on project cost excluding administrative costs [1]. SOP 50 10 8.1 lists "hotels, motels, and other lodging facilities" as limited or special purpose property and defines a new business as one in operation for two years or less when the loan is approved [2]. A newly formed operating company meets both, so the requirement is 20%, or $4,754,509, with the debenture limited to 30% of the project [2]. Compared with an office or warehouse, the hotel classification adds five points of equity, about $1.19 million here: the cost of SBA treating a hotel as a building with a thin resale market outside its use. The contribution may be cash, project land, or borrowed funds that are subordinate to the third-party loan and the debenture and, without SBA's written approval, not repaid faster than the 504 loan [2]. Land held two years or more counts at a value set by an independent appraisal [2].
DSCR and break-even
| Year | NOI | Debt service | DSCR | Meets 1.15x SBA minimum | Meets 1.25x bank target |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Y1 (2029) | $1,476,366 | $1,645,172 | 0.90x | No | No |
| Y2 (2030) | $1,900,767 | $1,645,172 | 1.16x | Yes | No |
| Y3 (2031) | $2,063,257 | $1,645,172 | 1.25x | Yes | Yes |
| Y4 (2032) | $2,126,909 | $1,645,172 | 1.29x | Yes | Yes |
| Y5 (2033) | $2,192,503 | $1,645,172 | 1.33x | Yes | Yes |
| Y6 (2034) | $2,260,104 | $1,645,172 | 1.37x | Yes | Yes |
| Y7 (2035) | $2,329,768 | $1,645,172 | 1.42x | Yes | Yes |
| Y8 (2036) | $2,401,558 | $1,645,172 | 1.46x | Yes | Yes |
| Y9 (2037) | $2,475,542 | $1,645,172 | 1.50x | Yes | Yes |
| Y10 (2038) | $2,551,782 | $1,645,172 | 1.55x | Yes | Yes |
SOP 50 10 8.1 requires 504 debt service coverage of at least 1.15, defined as EBITDA divided by combined post-transaction debt service. When historical cash flow cannot show it, as for a new business, the CDC must analyze at least two years of projections, and if they show repayment in Year 2 but not in Year 1, sufficient liquidity must be shown to cover the Year 1 shortfall [2]. The 1.25x bank target is an assumption. This model uses NOI after the FF&E reserve, which is stricter than EBITDA. On the SOP's EBITDA basis Year 1 is 0.95x and Year 2 is 1.25x. On the stricter basis Year 2 is 1.155x, clearing the floor by half a hundredth: at the edge of the rule, not inside it. The Year 1 shortfall is $168,806.
| DSCR threshold (Year 4 debt service) | Break-even occupancy at Year 4 ADR ($176.13) | Implied RevPAR | Break-even ADR at 78% occupancy |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1.00x | 67.3% | $118.55 | $156.86 |
| 1.15x | 72.8% | $128.19 | $166.73 |
| 1.25x | 76.4% | $134.63 | $173.31 |
The modelled hotel covers its debt at 67.3% occupancy and the SBA floor at 72.8%, a 5.2-point cushion; ADR can fall 5.3% before coverage hits 1.15x. With the corridor modelled at 69.5% to 73.8% in 2029 to 2031, the subject must beat the market to keep that cushion.
Returns
| Measure | Result (modelled) |
|---|---|
| Year 11 NOI (basis for exit) | $2,630,350 |
| Exit value at 8.50% terminal cap rate | $30,945,295 |
| Selling costs (3.0%) | $928,359 |
| Bank loan balance at end of Year 10 | $11,249,832 |
| 504 balance at end of Year 10 | $3,864,122 |
| Net sale proceeds to equity | $14,902,982 |
| Cumulative cash flow after debt service, Years 1 to 10 | $5,326,836 |
| Unlevered IRR (cost spent at mid-construction) | 9.4% |
| Levered IRR (equity in at closing, 18 months before opening) | 14.8% |
| Equity multiple | 4.25x |
| Payback of equity from operating cash flow alone | 9.4 years after opening |
| Stabilized value, Year 4 NOI at 8.50% | $25,022,459 |
| Loan-to-value at stabilization (bank + 504 gross) | 76.5% |
| Bank first-lien loan-to-value at stabilization | 56.5% |
| Year 4 yield on cost | 8.95% |
The levered IRR dates the borrower's cash to closing, 18 months before opening, because the 504 contribution goes in first; the unlevered IRR places cost at mid-construction. Measured from opening, as many sponsor models do, the figures would be 17.7% and 10.4%, overstated because they ignore the construction period.
Most of the return comes from the sale: the exit supplies $14.9 million of $20.2 million in distributions. At a 9.50% terminal cap the levered IRR falls to 13.2% and the multiple to 3.59x; at 8.00% they rise to 15.7% and 4.65x. A 504 lender does not rely on the exit, but stabilized value sets collateral cover: the bank's lien is 56.5% of value and total debt 76.5%.
Cash-on-cash yield tells the sponsor's side of the story. Cash flow after debt service is 5.4% of equity in Year 2, 8.8% in Year 3 and 10.1% in Year 4, reaching 19.1% by Year 10 as ADR growth compounds against fixed debt service. A sponsor accepting a single-digit current yield for the first three years is betting on rate growth and the exit, which is reasonable for a new hotel but means the equity has little incentive to support the loan in a deep downturn unless it is also guaranteed.
Sensitivity and stress tests
The first grid varies the bank rate against stabilized occupancy (Year 4 DSCR, modelled); the 504 rate stays at 6.40% because it is fixed at debenture sale.
| Bank rate \ stabilized occupancy | 70% | 74% | 78% | 82% |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6.40% | 1.15x | 1.27x | 1.38x | 1.50x |
| 6.90% | 1.11x | 1.22x | 1.34x | 1.45x |
| 7.40% | 1.07x | 1.18x | 1.29x | 1.40x |
| 7.90% | 1.04x | 1.14x | 1.25x | 1.36x |
| 8.40% | 1.01x | 1.11x | 1.21x | 1.31x |
| 8.90% | 0.97x | 1.07x | 1.17x | 1.27x |
The second grid varies Year 4 ADR against occupancy at the base bank rate (modelled).
| Year 4 ADR change \ stabilized occupancy | 70% | 74% | 78% | 82% |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| -15% ($149.71) | 0.71x | 0.80x | 0.89x | 0.98x |
| -10% ($158.52) | 0.83x | 0.93x | 1.03x | 1.12x |
| -5% ($167.32) | 0.95x | 1.06x | 1.16x | 1.26x |
| +0% ($176.13) | 1.07x | 1.18x | 1.29x | 1.40x |
| +5% ($184.94) | 1.19x | 1.31x | 1.43x | 1.54x |
Room rate moves coverage faster than interest. A 10% ADR shortfall at 78% occupancy takes coverage to 1.03x, while a bank rate 150 basis points higher still yields 1.17x. With the largest segment negotiating monthly rates in bulk, ADR is the variable to test hardest.
| Scenario (modelled) | Y1 DSCR | Y2 DSCR | Y4 DSCR | Y10 DSCR | Lowest DSCR | Y4 NOI |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Base case | 0.90x | 1.16x | 1.29x | 1.55x | 0.90x | $2,126,909 |
| A. Data-center construction slowdown: occupancy 60%/68%/71%, ADR -6% | 0.68x | 0.87x | 0.95x | 1.15x | 0.68x | $1,571,069 |
| B. Competing supply delays ramp one year: 56%/64%/74%/78% | 0.70x | 0.90x | 1.29x | 1.55x | 0.70x | $2,126,909 |
| C. Bank rate resets 200 bp higher in Year 6 (9.40%) | 0.90x | 1.16x | 1.29x | 1.39x | 0.90x | $2,126,909 |
| D. Expenses grow 5% a year against 3% revenue growth | 0.90x | 1.13x | 1.22x | 1.26x | 0.90x | $2,002,321 |
| E. Combined: occupancy -4 points, ADR -5%, expenses +1% a year | 0.70x | 0.93x | 1.02x | 1.13x | 0.70x | $1,677,477 |
- A. Data center slowdown. If the pipeline stalls, the hotel loses its largest segment and discounts to backfill; coverage stays below 1.00x until Year 6. This scenario decides the loan, and its mitigant must be structural: sponsor liquidity and guaranties.
- B. Ramp slip. If another competitor opens alongside the subject and delays stabilization a year, Years 1 and 2 fall below 1.00x and Year 2 misses the 1.15x floor, though Year 4 recovers fully. The cure is liquidity for two years, not one.
- C. Rate reset. A five-year fixed rate resetting 200 basis points higher drops Year 6 coverage from 1.37x to 1.23x, still above 1.15x.
- D. Expense inflation. Costs growing two points faster than rate push Year 2 to 1.13x, below the floor, and hold Year 10 at 1.26x.
- E. Combined. A modest miss on every line keeps coverage near 1.00x for years. This is the most realistic downside, and it shows little room for simultaneous small misses.
Structural alternatives
| Structure (modelled) | Equity | Bank loan | Gross debenture | Bank share of cost | Bank LTV at stabilization | Annual debt service | Y2 DSCR | Y4 DSCR |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Modelled structure (504 at the $5.0M cap) | $4,754,509 | $14,150,066 | $5,000,000 | 59.5% | 56.5% | $1,645,172 | 1.16x | 1.29x |
| If no dollar cap applied (504 at 30%) | $4,754,509 | $11,886,272 | $7,326,000 | 50.0% | 47.5% | $1,632,908 | 1.16x | 1.30x |
| Debenture cut to 24 jobs x $95,000 | $4,754,509 | $16,799,572 | $2,280,000 | 70.7% | 67.1% | $1,659,711 | 1.15x | 1.28x |
| Equity raised to 25%, 504 at cap | $5,943,136 | $12,961,439 | $5,000,000 | 54.5% | 51.8% | $1,540,692 | 1.23x | 1.38x |
The dollar cap changes the bank's position far more than coverage, and the most effective improvement is equity: raising it from 20% to 25% ($1,188,627 more) lifts Year 2 coverage to 1.23x and the bank's LTV to about 52%.
Program compliance
The checklist below follows the order a CDC credit memorandum would use. Two items need more than a tick. Size is measured with affiliates [15], so a sponsor with other hotels must count their receipts or net worth, and any 504 balances those affiliates already carry reduce the $5,000,000 available to this project dollar for dollar [2]. And because the operating company is new, every coverage test rests on projections, whose assumptions SOP 50 10 8.1 requires the CDC to justify, including by comparison to current industry trends [2].
| Requirement | Rule | Modelled project | Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Size standard | NAICS 721110: $40.0 million receipts [16]; or, with affiliates, tangible net worth up to $20 million and average net income up to $6.5 million [15] | Revenue about $5.7 million | Meets, subject to affiliate review |
| Hotel eligibility | Over 50% of revenue from transients staying 30 days or less, shown in start-up projections [2] | 71.3% at stabilization | Meets; monitor |
| Special purpose property | Lodging is on SBA's list; the CDC must address it in its credit memorandum [2] | Special purpose | Applies |
| Borrower contribution | 20% for new business plus special purpose, excluding administrative costs [1], [2] | $4,754,509, 20.0% | Meets |
| Third-party loan | At least 50% of project cost for a new business or limited or single purpose asset [1]; letter of intent, term sheet or commitment letter at application [2] | 59.5% | Meets |
| Debenture share | No more than 30% of the project for new business plus special purpose [2]; no more than 40% generally [1] | 20.5% | Meets |
| Debenture dollar limit | $5,000,000 gross outstanding per borrower and affiliates [1], [2] | $5,000,000 gross | At the limit; affiliates' existing 504 balances reduce capacity |
| Federal-source limit | No more than 50% of eligible project costs from federal sources [1] | 20.5% | Meets |
| Job opportunity | One job per $95,000 guaranteed by SBA [17], [2], or a 120.862 goal with the CDC portfolio average met [1] | 24 FTE against 53 needed | Shortfall; needs a 120.862 goal |
| Debt service coverage | 1.15 on EBITDA over combined post-transaction debt service; at least two years of projections; liquidity for a Year 1 shortfall [2] | 1.25x Year 2 on EBITDA; $168,806 Year 1 shortfall | Meets, with liquidity |
| Maturities | 10-, 20- and 25-year 504 terms [14]; third-party loan at least 10 years beside a 20- or 25-year 504 loan [1], [2] | 25-year debenture; 10-year bank term | Meets |
| Contingency | Up to 10% of construction cost [1] | 5% hard, 5% soft | Meets |
| Occupancy | New construction: borrower immediately occupies at least 60% of rentable property [1] | Operating company occupies 100% | Meets |
| Personal guaranties | Any individual owning 20% or more provides an unlimited full guaranty [2] | Required | Condition |
| Appraisal | State-certified appraiser above $1,000,000; value at completion for new construction; SBA as client or intended user; dated within 12 months of application [2] | Required | Condition |
| Third Party Lender analysis | The bank's credit memorandum or credit analysis for projects of $5,000,000 or more [2] | $23.8 million | Condition |
| Feasibility study | SBA may request one for market saturation or highly specialized property, among other reasons [2] | Corridor adding supply | Prudent |
| Fees | CDC processing up to 1.5%; SBA guaranty fee 0.5%; funding fee up to 0.25%; CDC servicing 0.625% to 2%; SBA annual fee up to 0.9375% [1] | Modelled at those levels | Meets |
The job line is the one most likely to change the structure. An extended-stay hotel employs few people, and 24 FTE supports only $2,280,000 at $95,000 per job [17]. Keeping the full $5,000,000 requires a community development goal under 13 CFR 120.862(a), such as bringing new income into the community, with the CDC's portfolio meeting its job average including this loan [1]; otherwise the debenture must be reduced [2] and the bank carries 70.7% of cost.
The transient test needs ongoing attention. Monthly rates attract crews but push revenue toward stays SBA does not count as transient [2], so a lender should require annual length-of-stay reporting with a covenant well above 50%.
Risks and mitigants
The risks below are ranked roughly by their effect on coverage in the stress tests. The first three are market and eligibility risks that no construction control can fix; they are answered by liquidity, equity and covenants. The rest are execution risks that standard construction lending practice handles, provided the sponsor's commitments are documented before the first draw.
| Risk | Why it matters | Mitigant a lender would look for |
|---|---|---|
| Data center construction slows | Largest segment (32% of modelled nights); most of the industry's economic benefit comes from construction [3]; Scenario A falls below 1.00x | Sponsor guaranty and post-closing liquidity; diversified segment plan; corporate contracts signed before opening |
| New competing supply | Corridor supply grows 26% from 2027 to 2029 in the model; assumed additions could open with the subject | Debt service reserve sized for two years of shortfall in Scenario B; site chosen for a segment the set does not serve well |
| Eligibility drift | Over 50% of revenue must come from transients staying 30 days or less [2]; monthly blocks push the mix the other way | Annual reporting covenant; cap on contracted 30-plus-night blocks |
| Federal per diem ceiling | Loudoun FY2027 lodging per diem is $121 [8] | Keep federal segment near 10%; price other segments independently |
| Federal spending restraint | Federal and contractor travel can shrink with agency budgets, and its rate is capped by the per diem | Stress the federal segment |
| Construction cost overrun | Hard costs are 56.9% of budget; a 10% overrun on site and building is $1,488,000 against a $744,000 contingency | GMP contract with bonds; sponsor commitment to fund overruns, since neither lender is obliged to increase its loan |
| Zoning district | The budget assumes by-right zoning with no added amenity package | Confirm district, by-right status and use-specific standards before commitment |
| Power for data centers | The utility paused new data center loads in Loudoun for three months in 2022 [3] | Weight crews below a third of nights; stress Scenario A |
| Debenture cap and job ratio | Bank exposure 59.5% of cost; job shortfall could cut the debenture to $2.28 million | Early CDC review of the 120.862 goal; bank appetite confirmed at that size |
| Interest rates | Bank rate and interim floating rate | 10-year fixed bank rate; 504 rate fixed at debenture sale |
| Expense inflation | Scenario D erodes Year 2 coverage to 1.13x | Operator with a regional cost base; insurance quotes before closing |
| Real estate reassessment | Income-based assessment could raise taxes above the cost-based estimate | Model tax on stabilized income before closing |
| Franchise terms | Fees assumed at 10.5% of rooms revenue | Actual franchise disclosure document and a franchise term at least as long as the bank loan |
Assumptions
| Assumption | Value | Rationale |
|---|---|---|
| Existing extended-stay competitive set | 1,050 rooms in 2026 | No public census; approximates the extended-stay hotels in the Dulles, Ashburn and Sterling corridor; replace with a paid competitive census |
| 2026 market occupancy | 75% | Assumption; no public occupancy data for the corridor; tested in the stress cases |
| Pipeline additions | 123-room economy extended-stay hotel and 169-room lifestyle hotel (25% weight), both in 2028 | Assumptions standing in for unconfirmed projects; replace with confirmed pipeline status |
| Segment growth rates | 6% to 3% data center; 3% corporate; 4.5% airport; -2% to +1% federal; 2.5% leisure | Assumptions; the data center rate reflects the construction weight of the industry [3] |
| Latent and induced demand | 5% of 2026 demand; 3,000 room nights | Midweek sell-outs push guests to adjacent submarkets; new-product distribution |
| Subject ADR | $158 / $165 / $171, then +3% a year | About $147 in 2026 dollars at stabilization; above the $121 per diem [8] |
| Subject occupancy | 64% / 74% / 78% | Derived from the penetration model; held at 78% |
| Land | $1.00 million per acre, 2.4 acres | No sourced comparable sales; to be replaced with closed sales |
| Hard cost | $205/sf building plus $1.35 million site work | Assumption for a high-cost county; to be replaced with contractor pricing |
| Franchise fees | 10.5% of rooms revenue | Assumed upper-midscale extended-stay fee load; no brand named |
| Bank permanent rate | 7.40% fixed, 10 years, 25-year amortization | About 2.5 points over the 10-year Treasury yield of 4.88% on November 9, 2026 [11] |
| 504 effective rate | 6.40%, 25 years | About 1.5 points over the same yield [11], including ongoing fees |
| Interim rate | 8.00% | Prime 7.00% [11] plus 1.00% |
| Debenture closing costs | $2,500 | Assumption used with the SOP's pricing steps to size the gross debenture |
| Bank coverage target | 1.25x | Assumption; the 1.15x minimum is SBA's [2] |
| Terminal cap rate | 8.50% | Extended-stay hotels in a large metro; tested at 8.00% to 9.50% |
| Jobs created | 24 FTE | Extended-stay staffing near 0.22 FTE per key |
| Real estate tax rate | $0.805 per $100 of assessed value | Assumption; confirm with the county |
| BPP, BPOL and other taxes | $400 per key plus 0.15% of revenue | County rates not modelled line by line |
Model determination
As structured, the modelled project is financeable under 504, but narrowly and only with conditions. It clears every hard rule: 20% equity on the correct basis, a third-party loan above 50%, a debenture inside both the 30% share and the $5,000,000 limit, eligible hotel revenue, and 1.25x Year 2 coverage on the SOP's EBITDA basis. It does not clear them with room to spare. After the FF&E reserve, Year 2 is 1.16x against a 1.15x floor, stabilized coverage is 1.29x, and break-even for the floor is 72.8% occupancy in a corridor modelled at 69.5% to 73.8% in the first three years. The data center slowdown breaks the loan, and small misses on every line hold coverage near 1.00x for years.
The structure works because SBA's long, fixed second lien keeps debt service manageable at 80% of cost. It is fragile because the $5 million cap pushes the bank above its usual exposure, and because the hotel's best customers are the ones SBA's transient rule counts against it. A lender would likely set these conditions:
- Liquidity reserve of at least $411,000 (three months of debt service), covering the $168,806 Year 1 shortfall, held until two consecutive years at 1.25x.
- Sponsor strength: full guaranties from 20% owners, as SOP 50 10 8.1 requires [2], and post-closing liquidity sized to the Scenario B shortfall.
- Equity of 25% ($5,943,136) preferred over the 20% minimum.
- Job and policy basis: a 120.862 justification accepted by the CDC before the bank commits at 59.5%, with a fallback if the debenture shrinks.
- Eligibility covenant: annual length-of-stay reporting, with transient revenue held above a floor such as 60%.
- Construction controls: GMP contract, bonds, sponsor overrun commitment, an as-completed appraisal with SBA as intended user, and by-right zoning confirmed.
- Market confirmation: a paid competitive census replacing the assumed 1,050-room base, and current status for every pipeline project.
With those conditions, a credit officer could approve this as a reasonable 504 hotel credit in a strong county economy. Without the reserve and equity cushion, its first two years depend on everything going right.
Frequently Asked Questions
- Why does SBA require 20% equity for this hotel instead of 10%?
- Two rules stack. 13 CFR 120.910 sets the contribution at 15% for a business operating two years or less and 15% for a limited or single-purpose building, and 20% when both apply. SBA's SOP lists hotels as limited or special purpose property. A newly formed hotel operating company meets both tests, so the minimum contribution is 20% of project cost, excluding administrative costs: $4,754,509 in this model.
- What is the SBA 504 debenture limit, and does it bind here?
- Yes. The gross debenture, meaning net proceeds plus financed fees, may not exceed $5,000,000 outstanding for a borrower and its affiliates. The $5,500,000 limits for small manufacturers and energy projects do not apply to a new hotel. At a $23.8 million cost, the 30% debenture share would be $7.1 million, so the cap binds and about $2.26 million moves to the bank.
- Does the debenture cap hurt debt service coverage?
- Very little in this model. The 504 rate is only one point below the bank rate, so shifting $2.26 million to the bank adds about $12,000 a year of debt service. The bigger effect is the bank's exposure, which rises from 50% to 59.5% of cost and to a 56.5% loan-to-value. That can narrow the set of banks willing to take the first lien.
- Can an extended-stay hotel qualify for SBA financing at all?
- Yes, if more than half of revenue comes from transients staying 30 days or less. A start-up must show that in its projections. This model projects 71.3% of room revenue from stays of 30 nights or less. Because the largest segment books by the month, the mix can drift, so an annual length-of-stay reporting covenant makes sense.
- What drives extended-stay demand in Loudoun County?
- Data center construction is the largest source. Loudoun holds about half of Virginia's data center industry, and JLARC attributes 59,000 of the industry's roughly 74,000 Virginia jobs to the construction phase, with about 1,500 workers on site at the height of a building's construction. Dulles Airport, linked to Metrorail since November 2022, adds crew and business travel, and contractors, relocations and leisure visitors fill the rest. The model weights data center crews at 32% of room nights.
- What DSCR does the hotel reach, and when?
- On NOI after the FF&E reserve, modelled coverage is 0.90x in Year 1, 1.16x in Year 2 and 1.29x in Year 4, rising to 1.55x by Year 10. On SBA's EBITDA definition, Year 2 is 1.25x. SBA requires 1.15, and when projections show repayment in Year 2 but not Year 1, liquidity to cover the Year 1 shortfall, which here is $168,806.
- How does the federal per diem affect this model?
- GSA's FY2027 lodging per diem for Loudoun County is $121 a night, up from $115 in FY2026. Federal travelers, and contractors reimbursed under federal travel rules, generally will not pay more. The model therefore prices the federal segment lowest, at $136 by 2031, and limits it to 10% of room nights so that the per diem does not set the rate for the whole hotel.
- How many jobs does the 504 job test require for this hotel?
- SBA's current requirement is one job opportunity per $95,000 guaranteed, so a $5,000,000 debenture needs about 53 jobs. The modelled hotel creates 24 FTE, which supports only $2,280,000. Keeping the full debenture needs a community development or public policy goal under 13 CFR 120.862, with the CDC's portfolio meeting its job average; otherwise the debenture is reduced.
Sources
- 1.U.S. Government Publishing Office, GovInfo. Code of Federal Regulations, Title 13, Part 120, Business Loans (revised as of January 1, 2026). https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/CFR-2026-title13-vol1/xml/CFR-2026-title13-vol1-part120.xml (accessed 2026-11-11)
- 2.U.S. Small Business Administration. SOP 50 10 8.1, "Lender and Development Company Loan Programs" (effective October 1, 2026). https://www.sba.gov/document/sop-50-10-lender-development-company-loan-programs (accessed 2026-11-11)
- 3.Joint Legislative Audit and Review Commission. "Data Centers in Virginia 2024" (December 9, 2024). https://jlarc.virginia.gov/pdfs/reports/Rpt598-2.pdf (accessed 2026-11-11)
- 4.U.S. Census Bureau. "Small Area Income and Poverty Estimates: 2024, Virginia counties" (est24-va.txt). https://www2.census.gov/programs-surveys/saipe/datasets/2024/2024-state-and-county/est24-va.txt (accessed 2026-11-11)
- 5.U.S. Census Bureau. "County Population Totals: April 1, 2020 to July 1, 2025" (Vintage 2025, co-est2025-alldata.csv). https://www2.census.gov/programs-surveys/popest/datasets/2020-2025/counties/totals/co-est2025-alldata.csv (accessed 2026-11-11)
- 6.Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Authority. "Metro launches Silver Line Extension with opening ceremony" (November 15, 2022). https://www.wmata.com/news/silver-line-grand-opening.html (accessed 2026-11-11)
- 7.Virginia Tourism Corporation. "Record-Setting Tourism Spending, $35.1B in Virginia in 2024" (news release, August 5, 2025). https://pressroom.virginia.org/2025/08/governor-glenn-youngkin-announces-record-setting-tourism-spending-35-1b-in-virginia-in-2024/ (accessed 2026-11-11)
- 8.U.S. General Services Administration. "FY 2027 per diem rates for Virginia." https://www.gsa.gov/travel/plan-book/per-diem-rates/per-diem-rates-results?action=perdiems_report&state=VA&fiscal_year=2027&zip=&city= (accessed 2026-11-11)
- 9.U.S. General Services Administration. "FY 2026 per diem rates for Virginia." https://www.gsa.gov/travel/plan-book/per-diem-rates/per-diem-rates-results?action=perdiems_report&state=VA&fiscal_year=2026&zip=&city= (accessed 2026-11-11)
- 10.Peachtree Group. "Peachtree Group Announces Grand Opening of Home2 Suites by Hilton in Ashburn, Va." https://www.peachtreegroup.com/news-insights/peachtree-group-announces-grand-opening-of-home2-suites-by-hilton-in-ashburn-va (accessed 2026-11-11)
- 11.Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System. "H.15 Selected Interest Rates (Daily)," release of November 10, 2026. https://www.federalreserve.gov/releases/h15/ (accessed 2026-11-11)
- 12.U.S. Small Business Administration. Information Notice 5000-880695, "Issuance of SOP 50 10 8.1" (published August 14, 2026; effective October 1, 2026). https://www.sba.gov/document/sop-50-10-lender-development-company-loan-programs (accessed 2026-11-11)
- 13.U.S. Small Business Administration. "SOP 50 10: Lender and Development Company Loan Programs" (document page listing versions 8.1 and 8). https://legacy.sba.gov/document/sop-50-10-lender-development-company-loan-programs (accessed 2026-11-11)
- 14.U.S. Small Business Administration. "504 loans." https://www.sba.gov/loans/504-loans/ (accessed 2026-11-11)
- 15.U.S. Government Publishing Office, GovInfo. 13 CFR 121.301, size standards for financial assistance programs (revised as of January 1, 2026). https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/CFR-2026-title13-vol1/xml/CFR-2026-title13-vol1-sec121-301.xml (accessed 2026-11-11)
- 16.U.S. Government Publishing Office, GovInfo. 13 CFR 121.201, size standards by NAICS industry (revised as of January 1, 2026). https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/CFR-2026-title13-vol1/xml/CFR-2026-title13-vol1-sec121-201.xml (accessed 2026-11-11)
- 17.U.S. Small Business Administration. "Development Company Loan Program: Job Creation and Retention Requirements; Additional Areas for Higher Portfolio Average," Federal Register notice 2025-19072, 90 FR 47117 (September 30, 2025). https://www.federalregister.gov/documents/2025/09/30/2025-19072/development-company-loan-program-job-creation-and-retention-requirements-additional-areas-for-higher (accessed 2026-11-11)
Related
- 425-Unit Self-Storage Facility in Hillsborough County, Florida: An SBA 504 Model Study
- Model Study: Acquiring and Repositioning a 72-Room Boutique Hotel in Portland, Oregon, with SBA 7(a)
- A 120-Slot Infant, Toddler and Preschool Center in Middlesex County, Massachusetts: An SBA 504 Model Study
- What is a bankable feasibility study?
- Bankable feasibility study framework
- Hotel feasibility study
- Marina feasibility study
- Glamping feasibility study
- Wedding Venue feasibility study
- Restaurant feasibility study